Viewers tuning into the BBC’s latest adaptation of Agatha Christie’s novel “Towards Zero” on Sunday evening were met with a shocking scene that has since sparked considerable online commentary. The series, which features a cast including Oliver Jackson-Cohen as Neville Strange and Ella Lily Hyland as Audrey, drew attention not only for its audacious content but also for criticisms surrounding its pacing and overall execution.

In the second episode, a notably explicit scene depicted Strange engaging in intimate activities with his ex-wife, Audrey, on a staircase, culminating in oral sex. This moment, which is considered one of the most risqué ever featured in any Christie adaptation, was inadvertently witnessed by Neville’s current wife, Kay, portrayed by Mimi Keene. The explicit nature of this scene, set against the backdrop of a classic Agatha Christie mystery, has left many viewers stunned and spurred criticism across social media platforms.

Comments on X, formerly known as Twitter, illustrated a mix of shock and humour among the audience. One user quipped, “B****y hell, on the staircase (watching with my parents)”, while another suggested the incident would be humorously referred to in their household as “having your cake and eating it.” Critics of the adaptation have shared their discontent with the lack of a traditional murder mystery narrative, voicing frustrations about the slow pacing and lack of engaging content. One viewer lamented, “Christ this Towards Zero programme is slow! 2 episodes in and not a whiff of a slaughter in sight.”

The adaptation, which is based on Christie’s lesser-known 1944 novel, follows the story of a newly divorced British tennis player on holiday in Devon in the 1930s. Despite the intriguing premise, early episodes have faced backlash for what some perceive as excessive stylistic choices and a departure from the traditionally suspenseful plots expected in Christie’s narratives. Specifically, complaints have emerged about the cast’s makeup, which has been described as too modern for the historical setting.

Furthermore, the adaptation has been labelled as ‘woke’ by a segment of viewers, particularly in response to its colour-blind casting choices, reminiscent of the diverse assembly seen in the popular Netflix series “Bridgerton.” Some audience members expressed strong opinions on platforms like X, asserting that the depiction of 1930s England in the series misrepresented historical racial dynamics. One viewer remarked, “It’s been Bridgertoned, fostering the charming fiction that 1930s England was a paradise of racial tolerance & inclusivity. It wasn’t.”

Amidst the backlash, some praise has also been directed towards the cast, with individual performances, such as those of Clarke Peters, Anjelica Huston, and Matthew Rhys, receiving positive notes for their contributions to the show. However, Clarke Peters has himself voiced criticism regarding the application of colour-blind casting in non-fiction portrayals, stating it would be inappropriate in certain contexts, using the example of Ugandan dictator Idi Amin’s characterisation. He reiterated a preference for thoughtful application of this casting approach, distinguishing between fiction and historical representations.

The adaptation, directed by Rachel Bennette, is set to continue to unfold over its three-part run. Initial audience reactions point towards a divided reception, with some enjoying the fresh take on a classic narrative, while others feel disenchanted with the execution and adherence to Agatha Christie’s original storytelling style.

Source: Noah Wire Services