Plans to construct a new block of flats in Canning Town, East London, have been approved by the local development committee, despite objections regarding the lack of affordable housing options. The site, located at 116-122 Barking Road, currently houses a number of businesses, including a barbershop and a pawnbroker, as well as five existing two-bedroom flats.

The approved development will replace a cluster of two-storey buildings with a seven-storey structure that is expected to provide 15 residential units. This new complex will comprise 10 one-bedroom flats and five three-bedroom flats, all of which are slated to be sold on the private market rather than as ‘affordable’ housing—defined as housing that is priced for those who cannot afford to pay market rent.

During the public consultation process, six objections were received, highlighting community concerns about the absence of affordable options and the potential impact on local businesses. Critics of the plan also pointed out that the site is home to some of Canning Town’s oldest buildings, arguing that the proposed structure’s scale and design are not in harmony with the character of the area.

At a meeting with Newham Council’s local development committee on April 7, 2023, a representative from the development team defended the proposal, asserting that it is of high quality and aims to address local housing needs. However, Councillor Femi Falola raised questions regarding the target demographic for the new flats. “Is it fair to say that your target audience is not Newham residents? Is it fair to say that?” he asked, to which the representative responded that they did not have control over who would occupy the flats but insisted they aimed to serve the local community.

The context of the development is significant; the London Borough of Newham has the highest number of households living in temporary accommodation in the country, with over 38,000 households currently on the housing waiting list. Additionally, poverty rates in Newham exceed both the London average and the national average, adding weight to the concerns raised during consultations.

Cllr James Beckles also questioned the intended occupants of the properties, asking whether they were targeted towards young professionals or families, and if there was room to discuss the ratio of family homes in the development. The applicant’s representative stated that the financial viability report indicated that the site could not support affordable housing while remaining profitable. He noted the development’s allocation of 33 per cent of the homes as three-bedroom units, adding that the one-bedroom flats would likely attract professionals looking to move into the area.

Furthermore, the project includes plans for 350 square metres of commercial space to cater to various potential tenants. Cllr Jane Lofthouse raised concerns about the fate of the current businesses on-site; however, the representative refrained from commenting on their leases, indicating it was beyond their authority to address those matters.

Ultimately, despite the absence of affordable housing and the objections voiced by community members and local councillors, the plans received approval from five councillors, while two voted against and one councillor abstained. This outcome paves the way for the new development to move forward in a region grappling with significant housing challenges.

Source: Noah Wire Services