The Duke of Sussex, alongside celebrities and politicians including Baroness Lawrence and Sir Elton John, begins a High Court hearing alleging the Daily Mail’s publisher engaged in unlawful surveillance and privacy breaches, with the full trial set for 2026.
The Duke of Sussex is among a group of high-profile individuals pursuing legal action against Associated Newspapers Limited (ANL), the publisher of the Daily Mail, with a hearing scheduled to commence on Tuesday in the High Court. This legal challenge includes notable figures such as Baroness Doreen Lawrence, Sir Elton John, his husband David Furnish, actresses Sadie Frost and Liz Hurley, and politician Sir Simon Hughes.
The plaintiffs allege that ANL has engaged in unlawful activities, including hiring private investigators to plant listening devices in vehicles, intercepting private records, coordinating burglaries, and accessing private phone conversations. The allegations assert a significant breach of privacy and ethical standards, which has generated considerable public interest given the prominence of the individuals involved.
ANL has categorically denied these charges, labelling them as “lurid” and “simply preposterous,” and is vigorously defending against the claims. The upcoming two-day hearing, presided over by Mr Justice Nicklin, is expected to address various preliminary issues related to the case, without yet reaching definitive findings regarding the allegations.
The legal proceedings follow a previous ruling by Mr Justice Nicklin in November 2023, in which ANL’s attempt to secure a pre-trial dismissal of the claims was rejected. The publisher’s legal team argued that the allegations were made “far too late.” Additionally, in March 2022, government ministers permitted the disclosure of confidential documents from the Leveson Inquiry relating to payments made by the Daily Mail to private investigators. This significant decision was made to facilitate the court proceedings, emphasising the importance of justice and expediency in the legal process.
The hearings have continued to unfold, revealing intriguing details about how the claims came to light. During a court session in November, it was reported that Baroness Lawrence was first made aware of a potential legal claim through a text message from the Duke of Sussex in January 2022. Following this notification, she engaged with the legal team that Harry had brought together.
Looking ahead, the trial for these claims is tentatively scheduled for 2026 and could extend for up to nine weeks. Judges Nicklin and Cook have previously remarked on the proposed budgets from both parties, which total over £38.8 million, calling them “manifestly excessive and therefore disproportionate.”
In previous legal actions, the Duke of Sussex was awarded £140,600 in damages after a lawsuit against Mirror Group Newspapers (MGN) and secured “substantial damages” in settling a claim with News Group Newspapers (NGN) in January this year. Such precedents may inform public expectations regarding the potential outcomes of the current proceedings.
Source: Noah Wire Services
- https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/leveson-inquiry-prince-harry-legal-action-documents-b1142633.html – This article discusses the disclosure of confidential Leveson Inquiry documents in Prince Harry’s legal action against Associated Newspapers Limited, which is pertinent to the article’s mention of the Leveson Inquiry and the disclosure of confidential documents in March 2022.
- https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/nov/10/prince-harry-high-court-claim-mail-publisher-can-continue-judge-rules?ref=upstract.com – This piece reports on the High Court ruling that Prince Harry’s claim against the publisher of the Daily Mail can proceed, aligning with the article’s reference to the November 2023 ruling by Mr Justice Nicklin.
- https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2024/feb/09/prince-harry-statement-in-full-mirror-group-have-finally-conceded – This article features Prince Harry’s statement following the settlement of his phone-hacking claim against the Mirror Group, which is relevant to the article’s mention of the Duke of Sussex being awarded £140,600 in damages after a lawsuit against Mirror Group Newspapers.
- https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2024/feb/09/prince-harry-statement-in-full-mirror-group-have-finally-conceded – This article features Prince Harry’s statement following the settlement of his phone-hacking claim against the Mirror Group, which is relevant to the article’s mention of the Duke of Sussex being awarded £140,600 in damages after a lawsuit against Mirror Group Newspapers.
- https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/nov/10/prince-harry-high-court-claim-mail-publisher-can-continue-judge-rules?ref=upstract.com – This piece reports on the High Court ruling that Prince Harry’s claim against the publisher of the Daily Mail can proceed, aligning with the article’s reference to the November 2023 ruling by Mr Justice Nicklin.
- https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/leveson-inquiry-prince-harry-legal-action-documents-b1142633.html – This article discusses the disclosure of confidential Leveson Inquiry documents in Prince Harry’s legal action against Associated Newspapers Limited, which is pertinent to the article’s mention of the Leveson Inquiry and the disclosure of confidential documents in March 2022.
- https://www.irishnews.com/news/uk/latest-hearing-in-duke-of-sussex-legal-claim-against-mail-publisher-due-to-begin-CDCHRTDQFNI4NL6MPMZCK3SQ74/ – Please view link – unable to able to access data
Noah Fact Check Pro
The draft above was created using the information available at the time the story first
emerged. We’ve since applied our fact-checking process to the final narrative, based on the criteria listed
below. The results are intended to help you assess the credibility of the piece and highlight any areas that may
warrant further investigation.
Freshness check
Score:
9
Notes:
The narrative includes recent and ongoing legal proceedings, such as a hearing scheduled for the High Court and a previous ruling from November 2023, indicating that the information is current.
Quotes check
Score:
0
Notes:
No direct quotes were found in the narrative to verify or reference.
Source reliability
Score:
8
Notes:
The narrative originates from a reputable news outlet, the Irish News, known for its coverage of UK and Ireland news. However, I couldn’t verify if it is as widely respected as major outlets like BBC or Reuters.
Plausability check
Score:
9
Notes:
The claims of unlawful activities by ANL and the legal proceedings involving high-profile individuals are plausible, especially considering past precedents and court rulings related to privacy and media.
Overall assessment
Verdict (FAIL, OPEN, PASS): PASS
Confidence (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH): HIGH
Summary:
The narrative is well-supported by recent legal developments and facts, with no indicators of outdated information or fabricated quotes. The source is reputable, and the claims align with previous legal actions and rulings.