The European Commission is actively considering a significant overhaul of its sustainability criteria to facilitate greater access to financing for defence companies. This strategic initiative comes in response to complaints from the armaments sector, which has expressed frustration over current environmental, social, and governance (ESG) criteria that they believe hinder their ability to attract investment. The proposal is part of broader EU efforts aimed at boosting arms production across Europe, potentially enabling a faster industrial response to heightened geopolitical tensions.

Commission spokesperson Thomas Reigner confirmed that the EU is evaluating modifications to the sustainable finance framework as part of the ‘Omnibus’ package, which aims to create conditions conducive to rapid industrial growth within Europe. During a recent gathering with European defence firms, Commission President Ursula von der Leyen was expected to advocate for improved access to financing for the defence industry. Relaxing ESG restrictions might enable increased investments, particularly in key areas such as ammunition production.

Current ESG frameworks have been a sticking point for defence manufacturers. The lack of recognition for arms producers within the EU’s investment taxonomy has discouraged financial institutions from extending loans to these companies. Consequently, defence advocates have called for a reclassification of these firms as ‘non-harmful’ under ESG criteria. This push aligns with the EU’s commitment to remove barriers to financing as outlined in its recent white paper on defence policy.

In a parallel move, the European Investment Bank (EIB) has also been adapting its investment practices to provide more financial resources to the arms industry. Earlier this year, the EIB indicated a need to simplify lending conditions specifically for the defence sector, reflecting concerns over both global security and economic viability. The bank plans to double its defence funding from approximately €1 billion to €2 billion by 2025, signalling an enhanced commitment to allocating public funds towards strategic defence initiatives.

Euronext, Europe’s largest stock exchange, is also taking steps to connect investors with defence firms. It plans to create a ‘European Aerospace and Defence Growth Hub’ by 2025, which aims to streamline public listings and enhance the visibility of investment opportunities within the sector. These initiatives emerge from a growing consensus that European defence capabilities must be strengthened in light of increasing military spending, particularly due to the ongoing conflict in Ukraine.

Despite these efforts, concerns linger regarding the sustainability of defence investments. Critics point to the inherent contradictions of classifying defence firms as sustainable given their potential roles in exacerbating violent conflicts and supporting authoritarian regimes. Moreover, while large firms might benefit from these policy shifts, smaller and medium-sized enterprises within the defence sector continue to face financial obstacles. A recent European Commission report noted a significant financing gap for these SMEs, estimated at €2 billion.

To address these challenges, proposals have emerged for a multilateral Defence, Security and Resilience (DSR) Bank, aimed at pooling resources from allied nations to support long-term defence sustainability and joint procurement. This initiative highlights the urgency for coordinated investment strategies amid rising military expenditures and strategic vulnerabilities.

The evolution of investment policy surrounding defence firms marks a critical juncture in Europe’s approach to security and sustainability. As the EU grapples with its geopolitical landscape, the balance between promoting national security capabilities and adhering to ESG principles remains contentious, leading to a complex dialogue among policymakers, investors, and industry stakeholders.


Reference Map

  1. Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
  2. Paragraph 4
  3. Paragraph 6
  4. Paragraph 8
  5. Paragraph 4
  6. Paragraph 6
  7. Paragraph 7

Source: Noah Wire Services