Viewers of the Eurovision Song Contest 2025 have voiced significant concerns regarding the perceived censorship of audience reactions during the semi-final featuring Israeli performer Yuval Raphael. Her song, “New Day Will Rise,” was presented in the context of heightened political sensitivities surrounding Israel’s current military conflicts. Despite some reports of audience booing during her performance, the broadcast aired on BBC One seemed to downplay these dissenting reactions, leading many to suspect that the show was edited to filter out discontent.

Social media users shared clips from the event and rehearsal, reinforcing claims that audible booing had been present but was absent from the televised version. One viewer expressed frustration on X (formerly Twitter), suggesting that “Eurovision [was] adding crowd noise over Israel’s performance so viewers can’t hear the booing.” Another echoed this sentiment, claiming that despite efforts to mask the audience’s response, the boos were still overwhelmingly loud.

Officially, the European Broadcasting Union (EBU) has denied the allegations of booing, asserting that no such discontent was noted during the performance and insisting that the atmosphere remained celebratory and positive. However, as tensions between Israel and Palestine escalate, such denials have been met with skepticism. Various human rights organizations have condemned the ongoing violence in the region, which has reportedly resulted in over 52,800 deaths, a significant number of whom are women and children, amidst accusations of genocide.

Raphael, who herself survived the tragic events of October 7, where a Hamas attack left around 1,200 people dead, acknowledged the potential for negative reactions to her appearance. “I am expecting to be booed,” she stated ahead of her performance. Nevertheless, she emphasised her commitment to honouring her craft: “We are here to sing, and I’m going to sing my heart out for everyone.”

Calls to exclude Israel from Eurovision this year gained momentum, with over 70 former contestants signing an open letter demanding that both Israel and its national broadcaster KAN should be banned from the competition. The letter cites broader concerns over Israel’s actions in the region, and the climate surrounding the event has been charged with public protests. In a previous rehearsal, for example, six individuals, some members of the same family, displayed a large Palestinian flag and were subsequently expelled by security personnel. These protests underscore the friction between artistic expression and political commentary at such international gatherings.

Broadcasters affiliated with Eurovision have had to navigate this delicate landscape carefully. RTVE commentators at the event highlighted the ethical dilemmas at play, noting that the Spanish broadcaster had requested a debate about Israel’s participation due to concerns surrounding the humanitarian crisis in Gaza. Commentators raised awareness about the significant loss of life, framing their remarks as a call for peace and justice rather than an indictment of any nation.

As the Grand Final approaches, taking place on May 17, the stakes continue to heighten. Organisers are caught in the challenging position of maintaining the contest’s apolitical ethos while acknowledging the controversies that inevitably surface as a result of the current geopolitical climate. With protests anticipated to continue and strong feelings on both sides of the issue, the Eurovision Song Contest will undoubtedly find itself at the intersection of music, politics, and public sentiment.

Moving forward, the implications of these events extend far beyond the competition itself. They confront attendees and viewers alike with difficult questions about the role of culture during periods of conflict and how international platforms navigate expression in such charged environments.


Reference Map

  1. [1]
  2. [2]
  3. [3]
  4. [4]
  5. [5]
  6. [6]
  7. [7]

Source: Noah Wire Services