The rise of social media has transformed the landscape of health and nutrition, bringing with it both accessibility and significant risks. Recent analysis highlights a concerning trend: influencers promoting carnivore and ketogenic diets, along with raw milk consumption, are disseminating dangerous misinformation that poses health risks to millions. This phenomenon, classified by researchers as a group of ‘super-spreaders’, not only misguides followers but also serves their financial interests.

According to an investigation by the Rooted Research Collective and the Freedom Food Alliance, a staggering 87% of these influencers lack medical qualifications, with 59% possessing no health credentials whatsoever. Despite this, many present themselves as authorities, misleading followers into believing in their expertise. Alice Millbank, co-founder and chief scientific officer at Rooted Research, captured the essence of this issue, stating, “Nutrition is complex, but it doesn’t have to be confusing. Superspreaders exploit that confusion by offering dangerously simple answers dressed up as hacks, often driven by profit, not science.”

The analysis identified three predominant categories of straying influencers. The first, dubbed ‘The Docs’, includes individuals who leverage their titles for credibility yet may not necessarily hold legitimate medical qualifications. These influencers often use fear-based messaging to promote distrust in established health guidelines and push controversial dietary choices. The second group, ‘The Rebels’, adopts an anti-establishment tone, frequently challenging conventional health wisdom and promoting raw milk and carnivore diets with emotionally charged narratives. Finally, ‘The Hustlers’ blend wellness marketing with personal success stories, creating a polished image that masks their profit-driven motives through sponsorships and misleading diet consultations.

The reach of these influencers is particularly noticeable among younger demographics; 57% of millennials and Gen Zers report being influenced by nutrition trends on TikTok, where only 2% of content aligns with established public health guidelines. Alarmingly, one in five Americans reportedly trust health influencers more than their local medical practitioners. This situation is exacerbated by the prevalence of unregulated supplements and extreme dietary advice, often marketed through visually appealing posts that prioritise dramatic results over safety.

Financial motives further complicate the picture. The analysis reveals that a staggering 96% of these ‘super-spreaders’ have clear financial incentives linked to the misinformation they promote. Many run businesses selling supplements or providing coaching, charging steep fees ranging from $100 to $250 per hour for consultations, with some offering costly biohacking programmes. The lure of potential earnings can overshadow the significant health risks associated with the advice given, leading followers down paths of dietary extremes that may result in adverse health effects.

To combat the tide of misinformation, experts suggest multi-faceted strategies aimed at strengthening public health. Advocates propose integrating nutrition and digital literacy into school curriculums to help young people identify and challenge misleading claims. Additionally, a revamp of public health messaging is essential; engaging with credible nutritional professionals on social media can help provide a counter-narrative to misleading trends. Dr Matthew Nagra, a Canadian naturopathic doctor, voiced concern over the influence of so-called medical professionals who propagate inaccurate information, warning that this can have profound implications on public health.

The intertwining of nutrition misinformation with broader societal themes, such as women’s rights, also emerges from the research. Many influencers perpetuate outdated gender roles alongside their dietary messaging, suggesting a deeper cultural impact tied to the dissemination of such misinformation. This underscores the necessity for comprehensive understanding and interventions that transcend simple fact-checking.

In a world where social media platforms offer a two-edged sword of information access, enhancing critical thinking skills and promoting engagement with reliable sources become paramount. Combating misinformation is as complex as nutrition itself; it requires widespread education, the promotion of evidence-based public health messages, and a collective societal response to challenges posed by health misinformation in the digital age.


Reference Map

  1. Paragraph 1: (1), (2), (3)
  2. Paragraph 2: (1), (3)
  3. Paragraph 3: (1)
  4. Paragraph 4: (1), (4)
  5. Paragraph 5: (1), (2), (3)
  6. Paragraph 6: (1), (6)
  7. Paragraph 7: (1), (5), (7)
  8. Paragraph 8: (1), (4)
  9. Paragraph 9: (1), (2)
  10. Paragraph 10: (1), (5)

Source: Noah Wire Services