The Royal Ballet School’s recent initiative to embrace inclusivity through the inclusion of plus-size dancers and same-gender partnerships has ignited a fervent debate across social media platforms. While many applaud this progressive movement, asserting that “dance is for everybody to enjoy,” critics lament the perceived erosion of traditional ballet standards. This polarising dialogue comes at a time when the school is seeking to redefine its image following a disturbing body-shaming scandal that has cast a long shadow over its reputation.

Iain Mackay, the school’s artistic director, conveyed a transformative vision for the institution in a recent interview. He stated, “Audiences want dancers they can relate to,” highlighting a shift from the archetypal slim ballerina. Mackay expressed strong support for the visibility of plus-size dancers, affirming that this approach is already taking root within the school. His comments signal a broader ambition to reshape ballet’s audience demographics and storytelling methods. He predicted an increase in same-gender pairings on stage, asserting that such inclusivity could foster new viewership and draw in a wider audience.

However, this inclusive vision has sparked significant backlash online. Detractors argue that the quality of ballet could suffer, with some expressing outright disdain for the potential for plus-size performers, stating, “What a shame Art is now corrupt.” Critics have also raised concerns about the physicality and technical demands of ballet, questioning whether plus-size dancers can meet these expectations. The harsh nature of some remarks echoed the sentiments of an op-ed in The Times, which declared that the presence of “a fatty at the ballet” was unacceptable. Such comments reflect a deeply entrenched belief about the physical ideals required in ballet, one that many hope the Royal Ballet School’s current reforms might begin to dismantle.

Amidst this heated discussion, some voices have emerged in favour of the changes, arguing that skill and artistry ought to triumph over fixed ideals of body size. Supporters have pointed to the impressive skills of dancers like Lizzy Howell, a teenager who gained viral fame for her ballet performances despite being plus-sized. Actor George Keywood has also rallied behind the concept, suggesting that he would prefer to see a plus-sized dancer showcase their talent over a conventionally slim performer. His remarks cut through the controversy, introducing a nuanced perspective on the topic of obesity and performance.

Indeed, the Royal Ballet School’s commitment to inclusivity follows a troubling episode in its history involving former student Ellen Elphick, who publicly detailed her experiences of body shaming while at the institution. Elphick, who has since settled a legal case against the school, recounted distressing incidents involving her teachers that led to lifelong psychological consequences, including an eating disorder. Elphick’s case has initiated a critical examination of body standards within ballet and emphasised the urgent need for reform.

The Royal Ballet School, while not admitting liability, has expressed a dedication to the welfare of its students, suggesting that the new measures are part of a larger strategy to cultivate a healthier environment. As the debate continues to unfold, the potential impact of these changes remains to be seen, with many hope to witness an evolution in both the art of ballet and its reception by audiences worldwide. Moving forward, the school’s actions could pave the way for a more inclusive representation of dancers, regardless of size or gender orientation, thereby redefining what ballet can be in the 21st century.

📌 Reference Map:

Source: Noah Wire Services