Angela Rayner’s Renters’ Rights Bill, currently progressing through Parliament, introduces substantial reforms aimed at reshaping the private rental sector in England. Central to the bill is the abolition of Section 21 ‘no-fault’ evictions, which would prevent landlords from evicting tenants without providing a specific reason, thereby offering tenants enhanced security and protection against abrupt displacement. This shift is intended to recalibrate the long-imbalanced relationship between tenants and landlords, ensuring renters can better settle into their homes without the constant threat of sudden eviction.

However, some aspects of the proposed legislation have sparked considerable debate and concern among housing experts and landlord organisations. A particularly contentious element is a provision conditioning landlords who fail to sell their rental properties: if an attempt to sell falls through, these landlords would be prohibited from re-listing the property as a rental for a full year. This means they effectively forgo rental income during that period. Given that failed property sales are not uncommon, especially in a cooling market as recent data from Rightmove suggests, this provision risks incentivising landlords to withdraw properties from the rental market altogether. The National Residential Landlords Association (NRLA) warns this could exacerbate the already critical shortage of rental homes, with approximately half a million properties currently lying empty in England’s private rental sector.

Despite these concerns, Rayner’s overall strategy behind the bill aims to professionalise the rental market and encourage landlords to take a long-term approach rather than treating property rental as a short-term investment to be flipped quickly for profit. By banning no-fault evictions and enforcing a protected 12-month tenancy period where landlords cannot evict tenants for the purpose of selling, landlords are incentivised to maintain stable, long-term tenancies. This, in theory, mirrors rental models seen in many European countries, where tenants have greater tenure security and landlords benefit from more responsible stewardship of their properties.

Beyond evictions, the bill introduces a host of protections for renters. It mandates the introduction of a Decent Homes Standard for the private rented sector, ensuring properties meet basic conditions for health and safety. Landlords will be prohibited from refusing tenants on grounds of family status or benefit receipt, and tenants will gain the right to request pets without unreasonable refusal by landlords. The legislation also aims to prevent bidding wars among prospective tenants, a practice that can artificially inflate rents and reduce affordability. To support dispute resolution, a new ombudsman will be established to provide a more accessible and less adversarial forum than courts. Furthermore, the bill extends “Awaab’s Law” to the private rental sector, obliging landlords to promptly address serious hazards such as damp and mould following the case that brought the law’s namesake to public attention.

Reflecting a broader consensus, Labour’s reforms build on initiatives begun under Conservative chancellors such as George Osborne, who imposed tax changes that pushed smaller landlords out of the market, and Michael Gove, who advocated tenant protections. The current government, including Chancellor Rachel Reeves, has also sought to curb second-home ownership with extra stamp duty surcharges. This cross-party attention underscores the long-felt need to improve the quality and security of private renting while balancing reasonable expectations on landlords.

Yet the reform’s unintended consequences cannot be overlooked. In a market already characterised by high rents—Rightmove data shows record average advertised rents of £1,349 outside London and £2,698 within London—the risk is that tightening restrictions on landlords will further shrink available rental stock. Fewer properties mean intensified competition and rising prices, which ironically undermines the bill’s goal of improving conditions for tenants. The NRLA cautions that increasing the number of empty homes would deepen the supply-demand crisis, hurting precisely those the legislation intends to protect.

In summary, the Renters’ Rights Bill marks the most significant overhaul of the private rental sector in over three decades. Its provisions promise to enhance tenant protections and curb exploitative landlord practices. However, the proposal to restrict landlords from re-letting properties for a year following an unsuccessful sale may backfire by pressuring landlords out of the market and shrinking rental supply during an acute housing shortage. Balancing tenant security with healthy market functioning remains a complex challenge — one that demands careful consideration to avoid squeezing renters with unintended rent hikes. While well-meaning, some elements of the bill warrant further scrutiny and refinement to align good intentions with practical outcomes.

📌 Reference Map:

Source: Noah Wire Services