In south-west London and beyond, it is impossible to overlook the presence of Berkeley Homes, a dominant force in urban development whose signboards populating the skyline symbolize both opportunity and challenge in the UK housing market. Under the leadership of CEO Rob Perrins, the company has navigated a difficult environment marked by regulatory complexity, soaring construction costs, and an uncertain market that has tested many competitors. Now, with Perrins set to become executive chair following the retirement of his predecessor, Berkeley’s focus on discipline and cost control appears poised to continue shaping its strategic direction and influence on housing policy.

Perrins has helmed Berkeley during a period of sustained growth, skillfully balancing financial performance with operational rigor. His deep knowledge of the company and the industry’s regulatory landscape makes his appointment as executive chair a pragmatic decision, especially at a time when the government is pushing ambitious house-building targets requiring close cooperation with the private sector. Berkeley’s approach highlights the tension between the need for profit—expected in any business—and the vital role housebuilders play in addressing the chronic housing shortage. This tension is compounded by traditional ideological divides, with some politicians and local authorities holding sceptical attitudes towards private developers, often viewing their profit motives with suspicion. This scepticism has historically hampered effective collaboration, contributing to persistent gaps between government housing targets and actual delivery.

The government’s mission to build 1.5 million new homes over five years places London and other major urban centres at the heart of this policy challenge. London, in particular, suffers from a severe bottleneck: though it remains the country’s economic powerhouse and a magnet for both domestic and international capital, housing starts and completions are alarmingly low. For example, private housing starts in London have been reported at just 8,700 over the past year, with completions expected to fall even further by 2027. Meanwhile, construction costs in the capital have risen over 40% since 2016, while property prices have stagnated, leaving developers squeezed by rising input expenses without the cushion of rising sale prices. This financial strain is exacerbated by a complex regulatory environment, where safety concerns following events such as the Grenfell tragedy have added layers of scrutiny and cost. Concurrently, local authorities increasingly demand more from developers in terms of community contributions and infrastructure, sometimes without reciprocal flexibility in planning approval processes.

A notable point of contention is the use of development levies. Perrins advocates for local councils to favour Section 106 agreements over the Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL). Unlike the fixed CIL charges, Section 106 agreements can be negotiated on a site-specific basis, potentially allowing for more balanced deals that reflect market realities. However, many cash-strapped councils prefer the certainty of CIL payments, a stance that critics argue stifles negotiations and contributes to the loss of viable projects. This dynamic illustrates the broader need for a “reset” in the working relationship between housebuilders and local authorities, one built on mutual understanding and shared objectives.

Amid these challenges, Berkeley is adapting its business model to shifting market dynamics. With traditional new-home sales pressured by declining affordability and higher financing costs, the company is pivoting towards the build-to-rent (BTR) sector, marking a significant strategic shift. Planned developments include up to 4,000 rental homes primarily in London and the South-East, tapping into rising demand from renters who face worsening affordability in ownership markets. However, this move carries risks, such as the complexities of managing long-term rental platforms and the potential impact of future political and regulatory changes on the sector.

The broader housing market in London underscores the urgency of these adaptations and policy reforms. Over the past decade, London’s property prices have seen only minimal growth in nominal terms, effectively constituting a real-terms decline when accounting for inflation. High interest rates, stamp duties, strict mortgage lending criteria, and lower yields for investors have contributed to a sluggish sales market and eroded housing affordability, disproportionately affecting first-time buyers and lower-income households. Government calls for bold action to build 1.5 million new homes coincide with these market pressures, as policymakers grapple with the difficulty of stimulating supply without inflating prices or exacerbating inequalities.

The interplay between regulation, market forces, and political will remains a critical factor for the future of housing in London and beyond. Perrins has highlighted the inefficiencies within the current planning system, especially for brownfield sites. Where permission currently takes around four years on average, the ambition is to reduce this to one year to accelerate urban redevelopment. Addressing these bottlenecks could unlock significant investment and contribute to meeting housing targets, yet requires reforms that balance safety, community needs, and market realities.

In the face of these complex challenges, Berkeley’s cautious approach to land investment—with a recent pause on new project investments and a focus on selective opportunities—reflects broader market uncertainty amidst high interest rates and economic headwinds. Despite these pressures, the company has raised its earnings outlook, underscoring its resilience and strategic adjustment to capitalise on housing demand shifts.

Ultimately, the success of the government’s housing ambitions hinges on breaking longstanding cycles of distrust and inertia. Collaboration between housebuilders like Berkeley, led by experienced figures such as Perrins, and policymakers, including ministers like Angela Rayner, could pave the way for incremental yet meaningful progress. Such partnership is vital to navigate the intricate demands of the market, regulatory environment, and political landscape, offering the best hope of alleviating one of the UK’s most pressing social challenges.

📌 Reference Map:

Source: Noah Wire Services