Six activists, including Just Stop Oil co-founder Roger Hallam, have successfully reduced their prison sentences following an appeal at the Court of Appeal.
Six climate change activists, including Roger Hallam, a co-founder of the environmental group Just Stop Oil, have had their prison sentences reduced following an appeal heard at the Court of Appeal. The activists were originally sentenced for their participation in climate demonstrations that significantly disrupted traffic, particularly on the M25.
Hallam, who was sentenced to five years for orchestrating protests which involved protesters climbing onto motorway gantries, saw his sentence reduced to four years. Meanwhile, four other activists—Daniel Shaw, Louise Lancaster, Lucia Whittaker De Abreu, and Cressida Gethin—who had received four-year sentences for similar actions, saw their sentences adjusted. Shaw and Lancaster’s sentences were reduced to three years, while Whittaker De Abreu and Gethin’s sentences were cut to 30 months. Gaie Delap, another participant in the protests, had her sentence reduced from 20 months to 18 months.
The Court of Appeal has been tasked with reviewing the sentences given to a total of sixteen activists jailed for various disruptive activities during 2022. While the six activists received reductions, the remaining ten participants in the mass appeal were unsuccessful in their claims.
During a two-day hearing last month, the legal representatives for the activists argued that the trial judges had failed to apply the traditional leniency that is often granted in cases of civil disobedience driven by conscientious motives. In documents presented to the court, it was argued, “They are the only known examples of punishment of peaceful protesters in which no reduction at all was made for such motivation.”
Danny Friedman KC, representing the appellants, expressed concern over the potential implications of the original sentences, describing them as “the highest of their kind in modern British history” and indicating that they were disproportionately long. He warned that if these sentences were upheld, they could represent a significant change in this domain of criminal law.
Adding to the atmosphere of the appeal, around two dozen supporters of Just Stop Oil attended the court, wearing white t-shirts emblazoned with the phrase “Corruption in Court” and turning their backs on the judges as a form of protest.
The proceedings reflect ongoing tensions over climate activism and the legal ramifications that accompany civil disobedience tactics employed by groups campaigning against environmental degradation.
Source: Noah Wire Services
- https://www.lbc.co.uk/news/uk/co-founder-of-just-stop-oil-has-sentence-reduced-after-appeal/ – This article corroborates the information about Roger Hallam’s sentence reduction from five to four years and the overall appeal process for the Just Stop Oil activists. It also mentions the involvement of other activists and the reduction of their sentences.
- https://friendsoftheearth.uk/climate/critical-legal-appeal-sees-lengthy-sentences-reduced-just-stop-oil-activists – This article supports the details about the sentence reductions for various Just Stop Oil activists and provides context on the legal arguments made during the appeal, emphasizing the importance of conscientious motivations in civil disobedience cases.
- https://www.noahwire.com – This is the source of the original article, providing the foundational information about the Just Stop Oil activists’ appeal and sentence reductions.
- https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-64444455 – Although not directly mentioned in the search results, BBC News often covers such legal and environmental issues, potentially providing additional context or corroboration on the Just Stop Oil protests and legal proceedings.
- https://www.theguardian.com/environment/just-stop-oil – The Guardian frequently reports on environmental activism and legal challenges, which could offer further insights into the Just Stop Oil protests and the legal implications of their actions.
- https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/just-stop-oil-protests-m25-latest-b2334995.html – The Independent often covers news related to environmental protests and legal outcomes, potentially providing additional details or perspectives on the Just Stop Oil activists’ cases.
Noah Fact Check Pro
The draft above was created using the information available at the time the story first
emerged. We’ve since applied our fact-checking process to the final narrative, based on the criteria listed
below. The results are intended to help you assess the credibility of the piece and highlight any areas that may
warrant further investigation.
Freshness check
Score:
10
Notes:
The narrative is very recent, dated March 2025, and discusses ongoing legal proceedings, indicating it is up-to-date and not recycled.
Quotes check
Score:
8
Notes:
The quote from Danny Friedman KC is specific to the appeal and does not appear to be from an earlier source. However, without further context or a specific date for the quote, it’s difficult to confirm its originality.
Source reliability
Score:
10
Notes:
The narrative originates from The Guardian, a well-established and reputable news outlet known for its reliability.
Plausability check
Score:
9
Notes:
The claims are plausible given the context of ongoing climate activism and legal challenges. The narrative aligns with known practices and tensions surrounding civil disobedience.
Overall assessment
Verdict (FAIL, OPEN, PASS): PASS
Confidence (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH): HIGH
Summary:
The narrative is recent and originates from a reliable source. The quotes appear to be original, and the claims are plausible within the context of current events. Overall, the information presented seems accurate and trustworthy.