As the global climate crisis intensifies, the discourse surrounding climate action is evolving in unsettling ways. André Corrêa do Lago, the president of the upcoming UN climate summit, COP30, has highlighted a concerning shift from outright climate science denial to what he terms “economic denial.” This new form of denial challenges the very idea that restructuring the economy can effectively combat climate change. According to Corrêa do Lago, this trend poses significant risks to efforts aimed at transitioning towards a low-carbon economy.

In an exclusive interview, Corrêa do Lago expressed alarm over vested interests that obstruct climate policies capable of steering the global economy away from fossil fuels. He remarked, “There is a new kind of opposition to climate action… It’s an economic denial.” His assertion signals a critical turning point in the climate narrative—where discussions once dominated by scientific scepticism now grapple with economic feasibility. He believes this form of denial is just as damaging, potentially delaying necessary actions that could mitigate the impacts of climate change.

The perilous implications of economic denial have only gained traction with the rise of populist political movements worldwide. Notably, the Trump administration in the United States influenced a wave of backlash against climate initiatives, undermining efforts to promote renewable energy while dismantling vital scientific institutions. The ramifications extend beyond the borders of the U.S., as Corrêa do Lago indicated that such populism fuels a narrative suggesting that climate action does not benefit the economy, a stance many are now tasked with countering.

To confront these challenges, Corrêa do Lago, an economist and diplomat with decades of experience, is calling for a concerted global effort to shift perceptions around climate policies. He aims to showcase that tackling the climate crisis can lead to substantial economic benefits, asserting, “It’s the turn of those who believe in the fight against climate change to show and to prove that fighting climate change is possible.” This requires economists to rally their support for climate initiatives, framing sustainable policy as a pathway to improved quality of life.

However, the clock is ticking. Corrêa do Lago emphasised that urgent action is necessary if the world is to avert the most devastating outcomes of climate change. He pointed to a staggering need for funding, stating that developing nations require at least $1 trillion annually to fight climate change effectively until the end of the decade. Given the multifaceted financial challenges ahead, he is working on a robust financing strategy in the lead-up to COP30, which will take place in Belém, Brazil.

The summit arrives amid logistical challenges, including the controversial construction of infrastructure through the Amazon rainforest, raising questions about environmental commitment amidst ongoing deforestation. Moreover, concerns linger regarding the participation of pivotal countries like the United States, particularly with the absence of a former commitment to the Paris Agreement. Such geopolitical dynamics complicate the chances for substantial progress, with countries like Saudi Arabia and Russia potentially undermining collective efforts.

Each nation involved in the talks is expected to present its Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs)—a reflection of their emission reduction targets—but minimal progress has been made as deadlines approach. Only a small number of countries have submitted these crucial documents, heightening tension as expectations mount ahead of the summit. Corrêa do Lago and the Brazilian government are collaborating on a roadmap that outlines necessary actions for achieving financial goals, with the hope that clear, actionable strategies can galvanise global commitment.

Reflecting on the complexity of the climate challenge, Corrêa do Lago compares current efforts to historical human interventions, such as the successful campaign against ozone depletion. He acknowledges the depth of the climate crisis—far broader and with more profound economic implications—but holds onto a vision of cohesive action. He asserts, “If we fail? The alternative is accelerating climate change,” thus underscoring the pressing need for unity and commitment on a global scale.

In conclusion, as COP30 approaches, the fundamental challenge lies not only in addressing the well-documented scientific consensus on climate change but in overcoming the formidable barriers of economic denial. This summit may well determine whether the world can rally around an agenda that sees economic transformation not as a hindrance but as an opportunity for a sustainable and equitable future.

Reference Map:

Source: Noah Wire Services