In a significant setback for local development, Ground Developments has failed to overturn the planning refusal for the transformation of Crail Airfield, a former World War II military base. The company had ambitious plans to turn the site into a thriving tourist destination that would feature 91 holiday lodges, six business premises, a hotel, and an open-air museum. However, strong opposition from local residents and concerns regarding infrastructure have hindered the project.

Ground Developments expressed frustration at what they termed “shortsighted councillors and Nimby campaigners”, blaming the rejection on public opposition bolstered by fears of increased traffic and road safety. Over 200 individuals objected to the plans, with many citing that the narrow access road leading to the airfield would be ill-equipped to accommodate the influx of vehicles associated with the proposed developments. The Scottish Government upheld the planning committee’s refusal, reinforcing the assessment that the project was not acceptable without alternative access routes and adequate public transport options.

The decision, conveyed by reporter Sue Bell from Holyrood’s Planning and Environmental Appeals Division, acknowledged the potential economic benefits of the project, estimated at generating £27.6 million for the local economy and creating approximately 300 full-time jobs. Bell noted that while the proposal offered several merits, the lack of a feasible access solution was a crucial factor in the ruling.

Crail Airfield’s accessibility is a pressing concern; its only access is via a single-track road that leads to a dead end. Although the developer proposed a potential shuttle bus to connect the site with public transport, the appeal decision stated, “There is no certainty a bus service could be delivered.” Furthermore, Bell’s report highlighted that the nearest bus stop is more than half a mile away, with Crail serviced by just one bus per hour, making it less appealing for public transport users.

In light of the rejection, Ground Developments’ managing director, Kevin Mackenzie, decried the decision as a squandered opportunity to rejuvenate an important historic site. He lamented the lost potential for a development that could invigorate the local community and economy. Meanwhile, the Crail Community Council has echoed some supporters’ sentiments, stressing that while many residents view the derelict airfield as an eyesore, a major point of consensus is the need for improved access in line with Fife Council’s policy on cul-de-sacs.

To further bolster their position in the appeal, the Crail Community Council engaged a professional team, investing £10,000 into opposing the development. Concerns voiced by council members included the risk of creating a ‘death trap’ due to the existing road conditions, and the clear necessity for a new access route to ensure safety and comply with local planning guidelines.

The local council’s rejection of the redevelopment reflects broader tensions within community planning where economic aspirations must be balanced against safety, infrastructure integrity and local sentiments. As towns and regions strive to cultivate tourism, projects such as the one proposed for Crail Airfield illuminate the ongoing challenges in transforming ambitions into reality when met with grounded community concerns.

Reference Map

Source: Noah Wire Services