The recent Whole School Evaluation (WSE) report conducted by the Department of Education has raised alarm over the practices at The High School, a fee-paying institution in Dublin’s Rathgar. The inspectors have unambiguously criticised the school’s uniform and disciplinary policies, asserting that their current implementation not only fails to support the educational, social, and personal well-being of students but in some instances actively undermines it.

In an unusually stern assessment, the inspectors have urged the school to revisit its protocols regarding student behaviour, particularly regarding the sanctions imposed for breaches of policy. They recommend a thorough review aligned with Tusla guidelines, with a specific emphasis on addressing what has been labelled as an “unfair” application of disciplinary measures amongst students. Focus groups indicated deep-seated concerns about the inequity of these sanctions, especially related to dress code compliance.

The findings affirm a broader call for improvement in leadership and management at The High School. The report highlights a deterioration of trust and positive relationships within the school community, rooted in ineffective communication and a lack of systems for resolving grievances. It notes that many educators feel their opinions are disregarded in decision-making processes, suggesting a disconnect between school policy development and the perspectives of both teachers and students. Inspectors advocate for a collaborative approach in policy formulation, urging the leadership to actively engage with students and staff to cultivate a more inclusive environment.

While the report reveals significant areas needing attention, it does commend the school for progress in implementing national anti-bullying procedures under the ‘Bí Cineálta’ initiative. Additionally, there is acknowledgement of the commitment shown by the student council, which meets regularly with the principal, indicating a potential avenue for fostering improved communication and community engagement.

The report is equally critical regarding child protection training, stating that not all teaching staff have completed the mandatory training required by schools. This oversight raises essential questions about the governance and responsibilities of the school’s board, especially in a landscape where safeguarding student welfare is paramount.

Aspects of the school’s operational calendar also draw scrutiny; for instance, form three students traditionally conclude their academic year a week earlier than peers at other institutions. This practice, despite ongoing criticism for the past three years, raises further questions about compliance with educational standards regarding the minimum required days of instruction.

In addition to calls for revising disciplinary measures, the inspectors urge the school to collaborate on more constructive approaches that inspire positive behaviour among students. Recognising the need for systematic change, they outline recommendations for restructuring the school’s governance framework to reflect a spirit of partnership that aligns with the Education Act.

Overall, while inspectors rated the quality of student interactions and teaching as good, they emphasise the urgent need for effective communication systems among stakeholders to ensure that concerns are not only acknowledged but resolved. They stress that rebuilding relationships within the school community is critical for fostering a supportive environment conducive to both educational success and personal development.

Reacting to the report, The High School indicated that it would take the findings into consideration as part of a larger effort to engage with the school community and develop an appropriate action plan. As discussions move forward, the potential for meaningful change rests on the school’s ability to authentically incorporate feedback from teachers, students, and parents alike into its practices and policies.

Reference Map:

Source: Noah Wire Services