In a bold move that has stirred both acclaim and skepticism, Excelsior Academy in Hackney, east London, has implemented a strict mobile phone ban that the school’s headteacher, Omar Deria, credits for a significant leap in academic performance. The academy’s average A-level grades rose from a C to a B in the past year, prompting Deria to describe the transformation as “miraculous.”

Reflecting on the challenges faced upon his arrival at the school in 2022, Deria lamented the pervasive presence of phones among students, many of whom were found “glued” to their screens during classes. This distraction has been linked not only to academic underachievement but also to broader behavioural issues. Deria claims that about 90% of the behavioural struggles arise from online interactions, where students often adopt different personas that lead to conflicts in the classroom.

The UK Government has so far resisted calls for a blanket ban on mobile devices in schools. Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson dismissed the Conservative Party’s proposals, labelling them a “headline grabbing gimmick.” The Government argues that existing policies grant headteachers the necessary authority to manage phone use effectively, echoing concerns raised about the potential ineffectiveness of such policies based on recent studies.

A study by the University of Birmingham published in 2025 challenges the notion that phone bans lead to better academic outcomes or improved mental health. The research involved over 1,200 students across 30 schools, with findings indicating no significant correlation between phone restrictions and improved grades, mental wellbeing, or reduced overall smartphone usage among adolescents. While phone use during school hours was curtailed by about 40 minutes per day, students reportedly compensated for this time later at home.

In contrast, earlier research by the London School of Economics has shown that mobile phone bans can yield significant benefits. A 2015 study noted a 6.4% improvement in test scores among 16-year-olds, particularly benefiting students who were previously lower achievers. This highlights a potential avenue for reducing educational inequalities, suggesting that stringent phone policies may offer a viable strategy to help struggling students improve their academic performance.

Back at Excelsior Academy, students themselves have expressed gratitude for the phone ban. With fewer distractions, they report being more focused and engaged in their studies. Cilen Garip, a 17-year-old student, noted that the absence of phones has allowed him to concentrate more effectively on his work, while Hamz Hussain, 16, acknowledged that the change has helped him maximise his study time and appreciate his phone more during his free hours. Another student, Falma Hashi, shared that their social interactions have improved, as activities like card games have replaced phone browsing during breaks.

Deria’s assertion that banning phones not only improves academic performance but also mitigates issues like peer-on-peer abuse and online harassment resonates deeply in the current educational landscape. As schools grapple with the challenges posed by technology, Excelsior Academy’s experience could serve as a case study for other institutions contemplating similar policies.

Ultimately, while Excelsior Academy celebrates its achievement, the broader debate surrounding mobile phone use in schools continues, with differing viewpoints highlighting the complexity of the issue. The conversation is likely to evolve as further research emerges and educators seek effective solutions to engage students in a rapidly changing digital world.


Reference Map

  1. Paragraphs 1-3, 5, 6
  2. Paragraph 4
  3. Paragraph 4
  4. Paragraph 4
  5. Paragraph 5
  6. Paragraph 5
  7. Paragraph 5
  8. Paragraph 8
  9. Paragraph 8
  10. Paragraph 8
  11. Paragraph 9
  12. Paragraph 10

Source: Noah Wire Services