Dr Gregory Rogers, ex-NASA Chief Flight Surgeon, unveils secret 1992 video showing a 20-foot unidentified flying craft bearing US Air Force insignia, reigniting debate amid rising government UFO disclosures and whistleblower testimonies.
Amid a resurgence of interest in unidentified flying objects (UFOs) and related government disclosures, former NASA Chief Flight Surgeon and Air Force Major Dr. Gregory Rogers has revealed to the Daily Mail that he witnessed classified footage of a 20-foot flying saucer during his tenure in the early 1990s. This disclosure comes on the heels of multiple whistleblower accounts suggesting that the U.S. military may possess spacecraft not of this Earth.
Rogers, aged 68, claims that in the late spring of 1992 at the NASA facility in Cape Canaveral, Florida, he was approached by an Air Force major who presented him with a video of a UFO while they were both on duty. The footage purportedly showcased an exotic craft levitating within a hangar. After serving in the Department of Defense (DoD) for many years, Rogers decided to speak out following his retirement last month, aiming to support other military whistleblowers who have voiced similar experiences regarding purported alien technology.
“I know exactly what I saw that day, and it was in no fashion a conventional flying vehicle,” Rogers told the Daily Mail. His recollection includes details of the craft’s dimensions, describing it as “about 20 feet wide, probably 8 to 10 feet tall, and it had a shallow dome on top of it.” Notably, he observed that the vessel lacked antennas or flight control surfaces—a feature inconsistent with known aircraft.
Rogers recounted the events leading up to his viewing of the footage. Following an inspection of a facility tasked with assembling satellite components, he was unexpectedly invited into a locked room by an unidentified Air Force major, who expressed excitement about the footage. “He says, ‘Hey Doc, I got something to show you. It’ll knock your socks off,’” Rogers remembered.
Upon viewing the footage, he noted that the aircraft appeared to hover and perform unusual manoeuvres, including a 45-degree tilt while maintaining its position in the air. Such a capability, he argued, indicated an advanced propulsion technology not publicly known to be in existence.
In his narrative, Rogers described the specific moment when the craft revealed markings indicating it belonged to the U.S. Air Force. “It said ‘US Air Force’, and it had the US flying insignia,” he said. He further recalled the audio feed, which featured technicians in the hangar reacting to a loud horn-like sound, prompting them to move out of view just before the craft displayed its hovering capability.
The incident drew to a sudden close when another Air Force officer knocked on the door, leading the major to quickly shut down the footage and warn Rogers against discussing what he had seen. Reflecting on the experience, he noted, “I absolutely resent being a part of the events of that day. I didn’t even tell my wife for 15 years.”
Rogers’ willingness to disclose this information is parallel to the actions of other former military officials who have come forward, including senior DoD intelligence officer David Grusch. Grusch testified to Congress, asserting that he had knowledge of a multi-decade UAP crash retrieval and reverse-engineering programme.
In addition to sharing his experience, Rogers has taken a position with the International UFO Bureau (IUFOB), a charity dedicated to researching and understanding UFO incidents. He indicated that the stigma surrounding UFO disclosures has deterred many from speaking publicly, emphasising that even fellow astronauts have reported sightings but remain hesitant to discuss them openly.
The growing wave of disclosures surrounding Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena has reignited public and governmental interest in the subject, leading to calls for more transparent investigations into the evidence surrounding them. As the U.S. military’s stance on the existence of such phenomena evolves, individuals like Rogers are challenging the narrative with firsthand accounts, suggesting that the truth about UFOs may be more complicated than previously acknowledged.
Source: Noah Wire Services
- https://www.noahwire.com – This is the source of the article detailing Dr. Gregory Rogers’ disclosure about witnessing classified footage of a 20-foot flying saucer during his tenure in the early 1990s.
- https://time.com/6298287/congress-ufo-hearing/ – This article discusses David Grusch’s testimony before Congress, where he claimed that the U.S. government has been concealing a longstanding program focused on retrieving and reverse-engineering UFOs and has discovered ‘nonhuman biologics’ at suspected crash sites.
- https://www.dailycaller.com/2023/07/26/military-multi-decade-ufo-retrieval-program-david-grusch/ – This piece covers David Grusch’s testimony to the House Oversight Committee, where he discussed his knowledge of the military’s alleged UFO retrieval program.
- https://www.nextgov.com/emerging-tech/2023/07/whistleblower-alleges-government-coverup-ufo-sightings-recovery-efforts/388871/ – This article details David Grusch’s allegations that the federal government has conducted a multi-decade UAP crash retrieval and reverse engineering program, collecting ‘non-human’ remains.
- https://www.foxnews.com/us/pentagon-denies-secret-ufo-retrieval-program-after-whistleblower-bombshell – This report discusses the Pentagon’s denial of a secret UFO retrieval program following whistleblower David Grusch’s claims.
- https://www.govexec.com/management/2023/07/whistleblower-alleges-government-coverup-ufo-sightings-recovery-efforts/388882/ – This article elaborates on David Grusch’s testimony before Congress, alleging that the government has misappropriated funds to retrieve and reverse engineer technology from crashed UFOs and possesses ‘non-human’ remains from these recovery efforts.
- https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14608915/nasa-official-breaks-silence-ufo-footage.html?ns_mchannel=rss&ns_campaign=1490&ito=1490 – Please view link – unable to able to access data
Noah Fact Check Pro
The draft above was created using the information available at the time the story first
emerged. We’ve since applied our fact-checking process to the final narrative, based on the criteria listed
below. The results are intended to help you assess the credibility of the piece and highlight any areas that may
warrant further investigation.
Freshness check
Score:
6
Notes:
Narrative involves 1992 events but references recent whistleblower trends (e.g. David Grusch) and Rogers’ retirement last month, balancing historical and current relevance. Press release-like disclosure via Daily Mail warrants freshness due to newsworthy timing of testimony.
Quotes check
Score:
8
Notes:
Direct quotes from primary source Rogers are specific with technical details (20-foot dimensions, 45-degree tilt) but lack independent verification. No earlier references found, suggesting original testimony.
Source reliability
Score:
5
Notes:
Narrative originates from Daily Mail (known for sensationalism) and an unverified individual account. Collaboration with IUFOB (unestablished charity) reduces reliability despite Rogers’ NASA/DoD background.
Plausability check
Score:
4
Notes:
Claims align with recent UAP disclosure patterns but contain extraordinary assertions (US Air Force-marked saucer) without corroborating physical evidence. Cannot verify hangar footage’s existence.
Overall assessment
Verdict (FAIL, OPEN, PASS): OPEN
Confidence (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH): MEDIUM
Summary:
Historical claims lack contemporary verification but align with recent UAP disclosure trends. Requires physical evidence or corroborating witnesses to substantiate extraordinary technical claims about the craft.
