Plans for the construction of six affordable homes on Norbins Road car park in Glastonbury have been halted following a decisive vote by Somerset Council’s East Planning Committee. The proposal, submitted by housing provider Aster Group, was rejected 5–3 despite the backing of planning officers, who had recommended its approval. The councillors took a stand against the proposal, voicing concerns about the loss of a community asset that has long been more than just a collection of garages.

The car park, which offers 49 standard parking bays and operates daily from 9 am to 6 pm, was described by many locals as an informal community space, vital for the area’s character. Councillors identified the scheme as conflicting with Mendip Local Plan policies DP1 and DP7, which protect spaces deemed essential for community well-being. Their decision reflects a growing sensitivity among local authorities towards maintaining public amenities, especially amid increasing pressures for housing development.

Aster Group’s plan included the construction of two-storey terraced homes designed to harmonise with Glastonbury’s aesthetic, alongside green landscaping, 14 parking spaces, secure cycle storage, and a retained stone barn at the rear of the site. Nevertheless, objections from the public highlighted issues such as narrow access roads, noise from local schools, and possible negative impacts on adjacent residential properties. Moreover, the site poses environmental challenges, specifically the need to consider phosphate runoff due to its location within the Somerset Levels and Moors RAMSAR catchment, further complicating the development process.

Interestingly, this proposal follows a broader initiative in Somerset, with Mendip District Council approving plans for the construction of approximately 150 new affordable homes across various sites, including Norbins Road. This comprehensive development aims to address the urgent demand for affordable housing in the region, where nearly 1,700 households are registered for social rent. However, while the council has set ambitious goals for social housing, the rejection of this specific plan underscores the complexities involved in balancing community needs with the pressing demand for new homes.

The residents’ views have significant weight, as their protests evidently influenced the committee’s decision to prioritise local amenity over potential housing gains. The application, reference 2021/2640/FUL, has the possibility of returning in a revised format, though for the time being, the land will remain unchanged. This ongoing dialogue between developers, local authorities, and residents will be pivotal as future housing strategies unfold in the area, particularly in light of the persistent housing crisis affecting many communities across the UK.

As communities like Glastonbury grapple with balancing development demands against preserved local identity and amenity, it remains to be seen how this evolving narrative will shape future planning policies and housing initiatives in the region.

📌 Reference Map:

Source: Noah Wire Services