The prestigious Goldsmith Street council housing development in Norwich, which won the RIBA Stirling Prize in 2019 for its high-quality, energy-efficient design, has become a focal point in the ongoing debate over the UK Government’s Right to Buy policy. Dezeen revealed that two homes in this celebrated development were sold last summer under the scheme for approximately £215,424 each, a figure reportedly below the average local house price of £228,000. These sales were facilitated by significant taxpayer-funded discounts amounting to tens of thousands of pounds per home, sparking fresh concerns about the erosion of scarce social housing stock.

Designed by the London-based practice Mikhail Riches and Cathy Hawley for Norwich City Council, Goldsmith Street comprises 105 homes built to strict Passivhaus standards, which deliver energy bills reportedly 70% lower than the national household average. The development’s high profile as an exemplar of quality social housing underscores the controversy, as it appears to be undermined by the impact of Right to Buy, a policy introduced in 1980 under Margaret Thatcher that allows council tenants to buy their homes at discounted rates after three years of tenancy. The policy has been credited with helping millions into home ownership but criticised for shrinking the availability of affordable public housing.

Last summer’s sales followed applications by seven residents in March 2024 to buy their Goldsmith Street homes under the scheme, a move that drew public concern from local authorities. Beth Jones, Deputy Leader of Norwich City Council, emphasised the damaging effect these sales could have on social housing availability. The council has highlighted the tension between supporting home ownership and maintaining an essential stock of affordable housing for future tenants.

In response to mounting concerns, the UK Government has introduced major reforms aimed at protecting newly built council homes from Right to Buy sales. Housing Minister Matthew Pennycook announced in July 2025 that new legislation will exempt such properties from the scheme for 35 years, extend the required residency period for eligibility from three to ten years, and tighten discount arrangements. These measures are intended to ensure that councils have the opportunity to recover building costs and safeguard social housing stock. The government’s consultation on these reforms attracted nearly a thousand responses, signalling a high level of public engagement on the issue.

Devolved governments in Scotland and Wales have already abolished Right to Buy altogether, reflecting divergent approaches across the UK. Meanwhile, despite the imminent introduction of these reforms in England, more Goldsmith Street homes may be sold under the current rules, with several applications still pending.

The case of Goldsmith Street is not isolated. Another prominent project, the McGrath Road development in Newham, east London—which also won prestigious housing awards—faces similar Right to Buy pressures. Advocates for social housing argue that allowing such celebrated, high-quality new builds to be sold off undermines ongoing efforts to address the chronic shortage of affordable homes.

Norwich City Council and government officials have been approached for comment on the sales and ongoing applications related to Goldsmith Street, while the architects at Mikhail Riches have declined to comment.

The evolving situation at Goldsmith Street highlights the broader tensions between empowering tenants with opportunities to own their homes and the urgent need to preserve and expand the social housing stock that remains central to addressing the UK’s housing crisis. The outcome of recent government reforms will be closely watched as they take effect, determining how future generations of affordable homes are protected in the years ahead.

📌 Reference Map:

Source: Noah Wire Services