Bristol Airport has recently come under scrutiny following an alarming incident involving a passenger who was subjected to distressing security procedures concerning her prosthetic breast. The unnamed woman, who hails from Cornwall and wears the prosthesis after undergoing a mastectomy, described how she was repeatedly questioned by security staff. They allegedly asked her “What is that?” and informed her that a strip search would be necessary, leaving her feeling both shocked and vulnerable. In her own words, she expressed, “I was really upset, really shocked. I didn’t want to prove to two security women in an airport that I’d had a mastectomy.”

Following her experience, the airport issued an apology, acknowledging the distress caused and urging future passengers to inform security staff of any medical devices prior to screening. A spokesperson stated, “We are very sorry to hear about our customer’s experience,” adding that they take such matters very seriously. They have encouraged passengers to notify security about prosthetics and medical devices to facilitate smoother screening processes, including the option for private searches. The spokesperson also affirmed that screening protocols for those with medical devices have been a longstanding part of the security training syllabus.

This incident is not an isolated one. In a similar vein, a woman from Belfast, Realtán Ní Leannáin, experienced a deeply troubling situation at Dublin Airport, where she was instructed to remove her breast prostheses in a crowded area. Speaking about the incident, she explained how “the security officer didn’t even offer to pat me down,” heightening her feeling of vulnerability. Dublin Airport later apologised, acknowledging that the approach to the situation was inadequate. Such events highlight a growing concern regarding the treatment of individuals with medical devices during airport security checks.

Furthermore, reports of distressing encounters with airport security are not limited to the UK. In Australia, breast cancer survivors have voiced frustrations over similar experiences at Perth and Melbourne airports where they were asked to publicly remove their breast prostheses. Advocates for these women have called for heightened empathy and better training for airport security personnel to ensure that the dignity of all passengers is preserved during screenings.

Historical accounts further emphasise the recurrent nature of these troubling experiences. Notably, in 2010, Cathy Bossi, a flight attendant and cancer survivor, was asked to remove her prosthetic breast during a pat-down at Charlotte Douglas International Airport, prompting her to label the experience as distressing. Likewise, various advocacy groups, including the National LGBTI Health Alliance, have highlighted the need for improved training and awareness among airport security staff regarding the unique challenges faced by individuals with prosthetic devices.

In light of these incidents, there remains a pressing need for airport security protocols to evolve. While safety must be a priority, ensuring the sensitivity and respect for individuals with medical conditions or disabilities is equally crucial. As these facing challenges continue to come to light, public and institutional calls for change may prompt a more compassionate approach to airport security practices.

📌 Reference Map:

Source: Noah Wire Services