Gwyneth Paltrow has carved out a niche that leverages her celebrity status to front her wellness brand, Goop. Since its inception in September 2008, Goop has transformed from a lifestyle blog into a multi-faceted enterprise encompassing e-commerce, wellness products, and even a Netflix series, “The Goop Lab.” Recently, Paltrow has been in the spotlight once again, particularly for her notorious product, the ‘This Smells Like My Vagina’ candle, which has drawn both admiration and scepticism about the extent of her involvement in the company.

At the 2025 Mindvalley Manifesting Summit, Paltrow recounted the origins of the candle, which first launched in 2020. During a scent-testing session with perfumer Douglas Little, she jokingly remarked that one particular fragrance smelled like her vagina. According to Paltrow, the comment was made in jest, and she was surprised to find that this whimsical notion had manifested into an actual product on her website without her knowledge. “What a punk-rock, feminist statement to have that on your table,” Paltrow remarked when discussing the significance of the candle during a previous interview. It sold out immediately, a testament to the brand’s ability to capture public interest, but also raising eyebrows about Paltrow’s narrative.

However, the backstory has elicited mixed reactions, with increasingly sceptical fans scrutinising the authenticity of her claims. Many are questioning just how involved Paltrow truly is in Goop’s daily functions. Online discussions and social media threads have seen users suspecting that the entire genesis of the candle might have been more orchestrated than spontaneous. One Reddit user encapsulated the sentiment by suggesting, “It is possible she has little to do with the day-to-day running of the business,” hinting at the idea that celebrity brands often rely on established professionals who handle operations behind the scenes.

This suspicion is supported by a broader conversation regarding the authenticity of celebrity wellness products. News outlets like The New York Times and BBC have explored the ramifications of such branding efforts. Paltrow’s approach—mixing humour with marketing—has drawn scrutiny not just for the product itself, but for what it says about celebrity culture and its influence on consumer choices. The immediate sell-out of the $75 candle appears calculated to harness the buzz surrounding its cheeky premise, leading some to contend that Paltrow’s narrative might serve as an exciting PR stunt rather than a reflection of her personal brand philosophy.

Critics of the candle’s origin story argue that while it might resonate as a feminist statement, it ultimately raises questions about the sincerity of celebrity-driven ventures in the wellness space. As another online commentator pointed out, “These fake PR stories undermine genuine narratives in entrepreneurship.” Yet the candle’s rapid success also illustrates the potent intersection of celebrity culture, humour, and consumerism, indicating that even amidst doubt, Goop continues to wield considerable influence.

While Paltrow’s anecdotes elicit laughter and applause, they also invite scepticism, challenging the authenticity of her entrepreneurial claims. As Goop continues to evolve, the line between genuine engagement with her brand and the curated narratives crafted for public consumption becomes increasingly blurred, leaving fans to ponder the true essence behind the playful marketing.


Reference Map

  1. (1), (2), (4), (5)
  2. (1), (3), (6)
  3. (1), (5), (6)
  4. (1), (2), (5), (7)
  5. (2), (3), (4), (6)
  6. (1), (2), (4), (5)
  7. (2), (3), (5), (6)

Source: Noah Wire Services