Londoners were told to expect higher pollution alongside a mid‑August heatwave as officials issued a high pollution alert during temperatures forecast to reach about 34°C. According to the Evening Standard, City Hall and Imperial College warned that hot, sunny conditions are likely to lift ozone levels across the capital, prompting public health advice and the temporary activation of pollution alerts displayed across transport hubs.

City Hall and health advisers urged residents to take simple steps to reduce exposure and emissions during the alert: avoid prolonged exercise near busy roads, keep windows closed during the warmest afternoon hours where possible, and refrain from idling engines or burning garden waste so as not to worsen local air quality. The Evening Standard highlighted particular concern for the very young, the elderly and people with pre‑existing respiratory or cardiovascular conditions.

The Deputy Mayor for Environment and Energy, Mete Coban, told the Evening Standard that “London’s toxic air is responsible for around 4,000 premature deaths in the capital each year, which is why the Mayor has done everything in his power to tackle it, including launching the world’s largest clean air zone.” City Hall presents the Ultra Low Emission Zone as a central plank of the Mayor’s strategy, and the scheme is widely described — including by international bodies — as the world’s largest clean air zone covering the whole of London.

According to a Greater London Authority press release, data collected since the London‑wide expansion of the ULEZ shows falls in key traffic pollutants compared with a counterfactual scenario without the zone, and the authority says these changes have improved air quality for around five million more residents. The GLA statement also cites rising vehicle compliance rates, which it equates to the effective removal of some 200,000 of the most polluting cars from the roads, and points to complementary measures such as a push for zero‑emission buses. These are the authority’s claims about the policy’s impact.

Independent research has provided additional context for the scale of the problem. A study reported by the BBC, commissioned for the mayor’s office and carried out by the Institute of Occupational Medicine, estimated more than 4,200 early deaths in London linked to long‑term exposure to air pollution and identified hotspots close to major roads; it also noted that outer London contributes a large share of the total because of its greater population. City Hall and others commonly round that figure to “around 4,000” when describing the human cost.

The expansion of ULEZ has proved politically contentious. Coverage in The Guardian recorded the Mayor’s argument that clean air is a right and described the expansion as driven by public‑health motives, but also reported criticisms from opponents and concerns about fairness — in particular the demand for scrappage support from lower‑income drivers, charities and small businesses. City Hall has pointed to targeted scrappage schemes and support measures, while campaigners and some politicians argue more must be done to shield vulnerable households and towns on the margins of compliance.

Scientists and public‑health bodies warn that climate‑driven heatwaves will continue to complicate air‑quality management because higher temperatures accelerate chemical reactions that form ozone. City Hall and academic advisers have used heatwave episodes to stress the need both for short‑term public‑health alerts and for longer‑term policy measures that cut traffic emissions. For residents, the immediate guidance is straightforward: reduce activities that add to pollution, follow official alerts, and take extra care with those in your household who are most at risk.

📌 Reference Map:

Reference Map:

Source: Noah Wire Services