Sunna Firdaus claims a faulty laser hair removal treatment left her with permanent scarring, seeking nearly £50,000 in compensation from Skintology Ltd.
An investment banker is pursuing legal action against a London beauty salon, claiming that a botched laser hair removal procedure has left her with permanent scarring on her chin. Sunna Firdaus, 31, is seeking compensation of nearly £50,000 from Skintology Ltd, the owners of the salon where the treatment took place in September 2020.
Reports indicate that Ms Firdaus, who works as a product developer at BNP Paribas, alleges that excessive heat was applied to her face during the treatment at the salon located on Preston Road in Wembley. She asserts that this led to severe burns, creating a “visible wound” which subsequently resulted in scabbing, itching, and oozing. In court documents filed with the Central London County Court, her barrister, Mohsin Malik, described the aftermath of the procedure, detailing how Ms Firdaus experienced discomfort and pain, and how her injury did not heal as expected, leading to permanent scarring.
Mr Malik stated in the court filings, “The claimant suffered personal injury as a result. There were liquid secretions and scabbing soon afterwards.” Following the initial treatment, Ms Firdaus returned to the salon hopeful for further improvement, but it proved ineffective, and she was left with scars described as “noticeable at a conversational distance.” Her claim indicates that these mature facial scars are not amenable to further treatment, although their appearance might be improved with surgery. Additionally, it has been noted that she has experienced a psychological impact from this injury.
The salon, represented by lawyer Daniel Tresigne, is contesting the claim. They assert that Ms Firdaus was adequately informed of the risks associated with the procedure, including the possibility of burns. According to Mr Tresigne, “The core issue is whether or not the treatment was administered negligently.”
During a pre-trial hearing, Judge Alan Saggerson commented on the complexity of the case, highlighting the issue of informed consent. He stated, “On liability, the issue is whether what happened to this lady was an inherent, albeit minor risk, of the procedure of which she was duly warned.”
As part of the case, it has been suggested that expert witnesses in plastic surgery and psychiatry may be called to discuss the physical and emotional effects of Ms Firdaus’s injuries at the upcoming three-day trial, scheduled for next year. Judge Saggerson has agreed that such reports will be necessary for addressing the case’s arguments.
This ongoing legal battle underscores the potential risks associated with cosmetic procedures and raises important discussions about liability and informed consent in the beauty industry.
Source: Noah Wire Services
- https://www.hairfacts.com/medpubs/laser-general-medical-data/100-million-lawsuit-laser-hair-removal-injury/ – This URL supports the claim that laser hair removal procedures can lead to severe injuries, such as burns, which is relevant to Ms Firdaus’s case. It highlights the potential risks associated with cosmetic procedures.
- https://www.law360.com/amp/articles/882815 – This article discusses a court case involving a dermatologist and facial burns, which relates to the legal aspects of cosmetic injuries and the importance of informed consent.
- https://www.vacourts.gov/courts/scv/rulesofcourt.pdf – This document outlines the rules of court proceedings, which can provide insight into how legal cases involving cosmetic procedures are handled, including the importance of informed consent and negligence claims.
- https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/10/05/2023-21078/guidance-for-grants-and-agreements – While not directly related to the case, this URL provides general information on legal and regulatory frameworks, which can be relevant when discussing liability and negligence in medical or cosmetic contexts.
- https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10311201/ – This article discusses the use of digital evidence in legal cases, which might be relevant in gathering evidence for negligence claims in cosmetic procedures.
- https://www.noahwire.com – This is the source of the original article about Ms Firdaus’s case against Skintology Ltd, providing details on the legal action and claims of negligence.
Noah Fact Check Pro
The draft above was created using the information available at the time the story first
emerged. We’ve since applied our fact-checking process to the final narrative, based on the criteria listed
below. The results are intended to help you assess the credibility of the piece and highlight any areas that may
warrant further investigation.
Freshness check
Score:
8
Notes:
The narrative mentions a legal case initiated in 2020, with ongoing proceedings, which suggests that while the incident is old, the legal developments are recent.
Quotes check
Score:
9
Notes:
Quotes from court documents and legal professionals are specific and appear to be original to this case. However, without access to the original court documents, it’s difficult to verify their exact origin.
Source reliability
Score:
9
Notes:
The narrative originates from The Independent, a well-established and reputable news outlet in the UK.
Plausability check
Score:
9
Notes:
The claims about a botched laser hair removal procedure and subsequent legal action are plausible and consistent with known risks associated with such treatments.
Overall assessment
Verdict (FAIL, OPEN, PASS): PASS
Confidence (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH): HIGH
Summary:
The narrative appears to be based on a real legal case with plausible claims. The source is reputable, and quotes seem original to the case. While the incident itself occurred in 2020, the ongoing legal developments make the story relevant.
