Recent remarks by former President Donald Trump concerning Prince Harry’s immigration status have led to speculation that King Charles III is relieved by the outcome, amidst ongoing scrutiny of the Duke of Sussex’s visa application.
King Charles III is reportedly “likely relieved” by recent comments made by former President Donald Trump regarding Prince Harry’s immigration status in the United States. Trump’s remarks come amid ongoing scrutiny over the Duke of Sussex’s visa application, which has been called into question following his admissions of past drug use in his memoir, “Spare.”
Prince Harry, who relocated to the United States in 2020 with his wife, Meghan Markle, has faced heightened scrutiny since he revealed in his memoir that he had used substances including cocaine, cannabis, and magic mushrooms. These revelations prompted the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank based in Washington, D.C., to demand transparency regarding his immigration records, raising concerns that Harry may have misled authorities in his visa application.
In light of this situation, Trump stated that he would not pursue efforts to deport Prince Harry if it were determined that he lied on his visa application. Speaking to the New York Post, Trump expressed, “I don’t want to do that. I’ll leave him alone. He’s got enough problems with his wife. She’s terrible.” His comments have been interpreted as providing some degree of reassurance to King Charles, according to royal experts, who believe the Duke would likely request an appeal should any adverse decisions regarding his visa be made.
As part of legal proceedings, U.S. District Judge Carl J. Nichols has ordered the U.S. government to specify which documents related to the Duke’s visa can be made public by 20 February 2024, a ruling that will ultimately determine what information can be disclosed to the Heritage Foundation.
Simultaneously, Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s charitable organisation, the Archewell Foundation, revealed its financial contributions, which have totalled over $632,000 to various Democratic-linked groups and individuals. These donations have included significant sums to initiatives run by Ashley Biden, daughter of President Joe Biden, as well as to established communications experts seen as allies of the Democratic Party.
Notably, the Archewell Foundation’s donations have stirred controversy regarding the couple’s purported commitment to political neutrality. Despite repeated assertions that they would refrain from political involvement, critics have questioned their alignment with Democratic causes, particularly in light of the financial support they have extended to politically related entities.
Meanwhile, Harry’s public engagements continue to attract attention. During his address at the Invictus Games in Canada, he spoke about the importance of moral character while thanking veterans, a speech perceived by some observers as indirectly referencing Trump.
As ongoing developments unfold regarding Harry’s immigration status and the couple’s philanthropic activities, both the royal family and the Sussexes appear to remain closely monitored by public and media interests. The dynamics surrounding their positions, particularly in relation to political affiliations, continue to evoke significant discussion and speculation.
Source: Noah Wire Services
- https://norrismclaughlin.com/ib/citizenship/prince-harry-u-s-permanent-residency-united-states-citizenship/ – This article discusses Prince Harry’s eligibility for U.S. permanent residency and citizenship, as well as his current immigration status in the United States. It highlights that despite being eligible, Prince Harry does not plan to pursue U.S. citizenship.
- https://globalnews.ca/news/11007583/prince-harry-us-visa-donald-trump-heritage-foundation-drug-use/ – This news piece covers the controversy surrounding Prince Harry’s immigration status, particularly the scrutiny over his past drug use admissions and the Heritage Foundation’s efforts to obtain his immigration records. It also mentions Trump’s past comments on Prince Harry.
- https://nationalimmigrationlawyers.com/will-prince-harry-be-spared-from-deportation/ – This article explores the ongoing debate about Prince Harry’s immigration status, including legal battles and public interest in his visa application process, especially concerning his past drug use admissions.
- https://www.vacourts.gov/courts/scv/rulesofcourt.pdf – Although not directly related to Prince Harry’s case, this document outlines general legal procedures in Virginia courts, which could provide context for understanding legal processes in the U.S.
- https://www.noahwire.com – This is the source of the original article, providing context for the claims about King Charles III’s reaction to Trump’s comments and Prince Harry’s immigration situation.
- https://quizlet.com/436882542/cs103-chapter-4-flash-cards/ – This resource does not directly support the article’s claims but provides general information on legal and ethical issues, which might be tangentially relevant to discussions of immigration and legal processes.
Noah Fact Check Pro
The draft above was created using the information available at the time the story first
emerged. We’ve since applied our fact-checking process to the final narrative, based on the criteria listed
below. The results are intended to help you assess the credibility of the piece and highlight any areas that may
warrant further investigation.
Freshness check
Score:
8
Notes:
The narrative includes recent events and developments, such as Trump’s comments and ongoing legal proceedings, indicating it is relatively fresh. However, some details, like Prince Harry’s memoir revelations, are from earlier events.
Quotes check
Score:
6
Notes:
The quote from Donald Trump is attributed to the New York Post, but without specifying the original date or context beyond the mention of the Post. This makes it difficult to verify the earliest known reference.
Source reliability
Score:
7
Notes:
The narrative originates from the Express, a known publication but not always considered the most reliable source. It references other reputable sources like the New York Post, but lacks direct citations from primary sources for some claims.
Plausability check
Score:
8
Notes:
The claims about Prince Harry’s immigration status and Trump’s comments are plausible given the context of ongoing public scrutiny and legal proceedings. However, some interpretations, such as King Charles’s relief, are speculative.
Overall assessment
Verdict (FAIL, OPEN, PASS): OPEN
Confidence (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH): MEDIUM
Summary:
The narrative is relatively fresh and plausible, but its reliability is somewhat compromised by the source and lack of direct citations for some quotes. The speculative nature of some claims also affects its overall veracity.
