Former Health Secretary Michael Matheson’s resignation from Holyrood has been marred by allegations of behind-the-scenes deals, raising serious concerns about the integrity of the SNP’s leadership. Reports suggest he agreed to step down under conditions that included passing internal vetting procedures and ensuring fellow party member Toni Giugliano was prevented from succeeding him as the candidate for Falkirk West.

Matheson’s departure follows a scandal involving an eye-watering £11,000 data roaming bill from a family holiday in Morocco, where his sons allegedly used his parliamentary iPad to stream football matches. This glaring misuse of resources has drawn attention away from pressing government responsibilities and reignited calls for his resignation. First Minister Humza Yousaf’s regret over the situation underscores the SNP’s growing mismanagement.

The party’s dismal showing in the recent 2024 general election has only amplified the backlash against Matheson, with Giugliano, who sought a parliamentary seat, linking their losses directly to Matheson’s irresponsible actions. Tensions between the two are also rooted in past disputes, with Giugliano previously accusing Matheson of attempting to sabotage his candidacy — a dispute that reportedly led to formal complaints to the party’s headquarters.

Further revelations about the circumstances of Matheson’s exit have deepened concern regarding the party’s internal practices. Insiders reveal that the move to keep Giugliano from consideration wasn’t about fair process but rather a calculated strategy by Matheson to negotiate his departure on his terms. A senior party figure indicated, “Matheson had no intention of standing down,” suggesting that pressure from party leadership, particularly from John Swinney, played a significant role in crafting the conditions of his resignation.

As dissent within the SNP grows, local party members have raised alarm over the erosion of democratic principles in candidate selection, accusing the party of succumbing to “backroom deals.” Calls for a transparent re-run of the selection process in Falkirk West reflect a broader desire for accountability and integrity, highlighting the urgent need for a clean sweep within the party’s leadership.

The ongoing fallout has intensified scrutiny of how the SNP manages complaints and disciplinary actions. While the party has firmly denied any wrongdoing, the discord continues, with Giugliano accusing the leadership of failing to hold individuals accountable for breaches of parliamentary codes — citing Matheson’s past infractions as a glaring example.

As the year progresses, the SNP is at a crossroads regarding its leadership and internal unity. Members are increasingly vocal about the necessity for reform and transparency as catalysts for restoring trust. This turmoil emphasizes not only the reputations at stake but also a larger narrative of accountability in Scottish politics, reflecting a growing appetite for change from a party that has strayed far from its principles.

Source: Noah Wire Services