MP Andrew Bridgen has been directed to pay more than £40,000 in legal costs to former Health Secretary Matt Hancock amidst their ongoing libel dispute. This dispute has its roots in a social media exchange that revolved around comments Bridgen made concerning Covid-19 vaccines, which Hancock responded to by accusing Bridgen of spreading “dangerous antisemitic, anti-vax, anti-scientific conspiracy theories.” The High Court in London ruled, instructing Bridgen to pay £44,300 towards Hancock’s legal fees.

The contention began over a tweet posted by Hancock in January 2023, in response to Bridgen’s sharing of an article related to adverse reactions to Covid vaccines. Bridgen claimed that Hancock’s tweet was defamatory, damaging his reputation by falsely accusing him of antisemitism. Despite this, the court found certain deficiencies in Bridgen’s claim, striking out parts of it while permitting him to make amendments to potentially keep his case viable.

Although Hancock’s legal team has advocated for the dismissal of the claim entirely, asserting it lacks a realistic chance of success, Mrs Justice Steyn has allowed Bridgen time to amend his claim to address the highlighted issues. Failure to make these necessary amendments within the set timeframe could lead to the dismissal of Bridgen’s case.

In response to the court’s decision, Hancock expressed his satisfaction, suggesting Bridgen should abandon the lawsuit, indicating it was a waste of time and resources. On the other hand, Bridgen initiated a crowdfunding campaign to cover his legal costs, indicating his intent to continue with the case, which he believes will expose Hancock’s “unlawful behaviour.” The legal battle underscores the significant challenges and complexities involved in navigating libel claims, especially those that emerge from social media interactions.