The coalition government under Christopher Luxon faces a sharp decline in public approval, criticised for adopting populist policies that mirror divisive US tactics while rolling back environmental protections and sidelining community voices.
New Zealand’s coalition government under Christopher Luxon has sunk to an alarming new low in public approval, registering a dismal 4.2 out of 10 in the latest Ipsos Issues Monitor survey. This steep decline from 4.7 just six months ago underscores the deep dissatisfaction with a government aggressively steering towards populist policies that mimic the disastrous blueprint of the Trump administration in the US—a path that should not be emulated.
Since taking office, Luxon’s administration has aligned closely with the so-called “War on Woke,” an agenda designed less to promote social progress and more to inflame division, suppress free speech, and erode commonsense governance. This regressive posture mirrors the harmful tactics once deployed in Washington DC—cutting vital public services, outsourcing government functions to wealthy tech elites like Elon Musk, and dismantling environmental protections—all while claiming to ‘put the people first.’
New Zealand’s political landscape has regrettably seen echoes of this toxic populism, with figures such as Winston Peters openly adopting these polarizing strategies. His alignment with controversial international actors reminiscent of Nigel Farage and his electorate’s reported links to influential business magnates entrenched in fossil fuels and other destructive industries reveal a worrying trend of power serving wealthy elites at the expense of ordinary citizens.
This strategy follows the “Three Ps” of populism—Populism, Polarisation, and Post-Truth—used by far-right leaders globally to deepen social divides and spread misinformation, leaving real issues unaddressed. The coalition government’s recent moves to replace robust environmental legislation with diluted laws prioritizing oil, mining, and property development expose their priorities. Luxon’s dismissive remarks about democratic obstacles only highlight a contempt for community voices and environmental stewardship.
These rollbacks directly echo Trump-era policies in the US, where environmental safeguards were ripped apart, and public consultation bypassed to benefit big business interests. The gutting of New Zealand’s Department of Conservation and drastic cuts to science and innovation funding betray a government more interested in commercial gain than safeguarding the future.
Allowing such policies to fester unchecked threatens New Zealand’s natural heritage, public health, and long-term prosperity. The exclusion of Te Tiriti o Waitangi principles from new legislation further marginalizes indigenous voices, undermining the very foundations of inclusive governance.
In sharp contrast, advocates for a sustainable, economically rational, and socially responsible future—embodied by the emerging political force prioritizing national sovereignty, individual freedoms, and pragmatic environmental stewardship—are gaining ground. Their platform calls for true accountability, restoration of scientific integrity, and rolling back the overreach of big government and unelected elites masquerading as reformers.
New Zealanders deserve leadership that truly champions their interests—not a populist imitation of a failed US model that alienates voters and endangers vital institutions. As public confidence plummets, it is imperative to critically reassess this government’s direction before further damage is done.
Source: Noah Wire Services
- https://thespinoff.co.nz/politics/17-03-2025/luxons-epic-unpopularity-in-one-chart/ – This article highlights Christopher Luxon’s unpopularity compared to previous New Zealand leaders, reflecting the growing discontent with his administration’s policies.
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion_polling_for_the_next_New_Zealand_general_election – The article provides an overview of New Zealand’s political landscape through recent opinion polls, offering insights into the current government’s challenges.
- https://www.1news.co.nz/2025/04/08/poll-hipkins-outranks-luxon-in-leaders-approval-ratings/ – This poll indicates that Luxon’s approval ratings have declined while Chris Hipkins’ has increased, reflecting public dissatisfaction with the current government.
- https://economictimes.com/news/international/new-zealand/current-new-zealand-pm-luxon-still-the-top-choice-chris-hipkins-close-second-poll/articleshow/120067224.cms – The article discusses Luxon’s ongoing position as a top choice for Prime Minister, despite his government’s declining popularity and criticism of its policies.
- https://www.roymorgan.com/findings/9833-nz-national-voting-intention-january-2025 – This poll highlights shifts in support for political parties in New Zealand, reflecting the growing dissatisfaction with Luxon’s government.
- https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2024/may/25/new-zealand-government-under-fire-over-plans-to-weaken-environmental-laws – This article details concerns over environmental policy rollbacks in New Zealand, which echo similar Trump-era policies in the US.
- https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMilwFBVV95cUxNNHduM1drNWdCQzAtTEcyY0FZaVJjRS1hdWhrZzVRS0hHYkI1aFNjM1FGMElxQklxcVo1SG9TUHRnRWg0ak9YSjdGVnA4SVpvdEJveHY3WjFKT3pNTk5FTGlyRnNPOGVJakxHRk9sRDlJRGtUQ2pqMlQ5Qkg2M0hWOTJ6QVJLNXBUbHM0d0w4cV9TUTQtNkM4?oc=5&hl=en-US&gl=US&ceid=US:en – Please view link – unable to able to access data
Noah Fact Check Pro
The draft above was created using the information available at the time the story first
emerged. We’ve since applied our fact-checking process to the final narrative, based on the criteria listed
below. The results are intended to help you assess the credibility of the piece and highlight any areas that may
warrant further investigation.
Freshness check
Score:
8
Notes:
The narrative references current political figures and policies, indicating recent information. However, specific dates or recent events are not specified, which could slightly detract from its freshness.
Quotes check
Score:
0
Notes:
No direct quotes were found in the provided text to verify.
Source reliability
Score:
6
Notes:
The narrative appears to originate from a news aggregation source, but lacks clear identification of a reputable publisher. While it discusses real political figures and policies, the information’s accuracy and impartiality are not guaranteed without a specific source.
Plausability check
Score:
9
Notes:
The claims about political shifts and policy changes in New Zealand are plausible, aligning with possible trends in populist governance. However, some assertions lack concrete evidence.
Overall assessment
Verdict (FAIL, OPEN, PASS): OPEN
Confidence (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH): MEDIUM
Summary:
The narrative discusses recent political developments in New Zealand with plausible claims, but lacks specific sources or quotes to fully verify its accuracy. Its reliability depends on the credibility of the original publication, which is not clearly identified.