Norfolk County Council’s decision to turn off 2,000 street lights as a cost-saving and carbon reduction measure has ignited considerable debate throughout the region. While the council projected an annual saving of around £200,000, the move has raised concerns regarding public safety and perceptions of crime in communities.

Critics of the initiative argue that dimly lit streets contribute to an increase in criminal activity and exacerbate fear among residents. Liberal Democrat county councillor David Sayers, representing Gaywood North and Central, recently voiced these concerns at a County Hall meeting. He questioned the council’s approach, asking: “What action will Norfolk County Council take in areas where residents have reported increased crime and reduced feelings of safety following the switching off of street lighting at night – and will the cabinet now review and consider restoring lighting in those areas to fulfil its statutory duty?”

In responding to these anxieties, Graham Plant, the council’s cabinet member for highways, transport, and infrastructure, clarified that decisions to switch off lights were based on comprehensive assessments and consultations, including collaboration with Norfolk Police. Plant reassured the public that the streets affected by the changes had not been identified as having significant night-time crime issues. He stated, “Where supported by the police and there is evidence that streetlighting is a contributory factor in an increase in night-time crime, we will consider reversing the switch-off decision in the affected areas.”

A significant factor complicating the discourse around street lighting is the existing literature on its impact on crime rates. Contrary to common belief, a large-scale study determined that reduced lighting typically has a minimal effect on crime. This was underscored by a 2015 national study, which, despite its findings, did not prevent growing apprehension amongst residents. In fact, numerous councils across England and Wales are embracing similar initiatives in a bid to manage budget deficits, leading to widespread discussion about the effectiveness and potential ramifications of such measures.

In February 2024, Norfolk County Council initiated a public consultation aimed at further reducing street lighting by 1.35%, with a long-term goal of a 2% overall reduction. The plan is designed to minimise disruption to drivers, pedestrians, and cyclists while allowing for resident feedback and police input to address safety concerns. This proactive approach is vital, as previous consultations have highlighted worries about the safety of vulnerable populations. For instance, many residents have expressed apprehension about the implications for women, schoolchildren, and those walking alone at night.

Moreover, the council’s decision to revert its long-term switch-off policy in Dussindale on the outskirts of Norwich illustrates a willingness to adapt to community feedback. By trialling part-night lighting, the council aims to balance fiscal responsibility with public safety, demonstrating an understanding of the intricate dynamics between lighting policies and community well-being.

As Norfolk continues to navigate these challenging decisions, the balance between financial prudence and ensuring public safety remains at the foreground of the conversation, reflecting broader trends within local governance across the UK. The community’s voices are central to future policy, reinforcing the importance of ongoing dialogue and evaluation in shaping the region’s approach to street lighting.


Reference Map

  1. Paragraph 1, 2
  2. Paragraph 3
  3. Paragraph 4, 5
  4. Paragraph 6
  5. Paragraph 7

Source: Noah Wire Services