The proposed demolition of the Oxford Dance Studio, located at Kirby House on Windmill Road in Headington, has sparked significant concern among its users and community stakeholders. The studio, which has provided a vibrant hub for dance activities since it began operating eight years ago, is home to the Oxford University Dancesport Club. This club plays a crucial role in the community, drawing around 400 members from both the university and the local public to classes such as Zumba, Ballroom, and Salsa.

The planning application submitted by Mr. M Aggwani to Oxford City Council seeks to replace the existing studio with a three-storey building comprised of five two-bedroom flats and a small commercial space on the ground floor. In the application, the current building is described as “vacant” and “in poor condition,” yet the studio remains operational, providing daily classes and is well-utilised by a diverse range of ages, including members as young as 18 and as old as 96. James Moore, president of the Oxford University Dancesport Club and director of the dance studio, passionately stated, “If this goes ahead, it’s going to kill the club,” underscoring the broader implications of the demolition on the local community’s fabric.

The proposed redevelopment highlights a growing tension in Oxford between the need for housing and the preservation of community facilities. Advocates for housing argue that Oxford is facing a significant housing crisis, exacerbated by the increasing population and demand for accommodation for those working in the city’s hospitals and universities. The developer’s plans indicate that the new flats are intended for “serviced accommodation,” catering specifically to this demographic.

However, local sentiment suggests a reluctance to add more residential units in an area reportedly already saturated with flats. Councillor Chris Smowton, who represents Headington, has already raised concerns over the planning documents, specifically their portrayal of the building as “vacant” and has called for clarity regarding the status of the dance studio as a protected community facility. He expressed his commitment to ensuring that the perspectives of the current users and local residents are adequately considered in the planning process.

The situation mirrors other recent developments in Oxford where community spaces are threatened by residential construction. For instance, a similar outcry arose over the proposed demolition of the East Oxford Games Hall, which was also intended for redevelopment into residential flats. Campaigners argued that such losses would leave areas devoid of vital community spaces, affecting local life and social cohesion.

As the debate unfolds, it is clear that the outcome of this planning application will have significant ramifications not only for the Oxford Dance Studio but also for the broader community’s access to facilities that foster social interaction and cultural activities. James Moore articulated the studio’s importance in blending the community of students and local residents, highlighting the shared benefits that such facilities provide. He reflects a growing sentiment that while housing needs are pressing, the preservation of spaces that promote community engagement and healthy interaction should equally merit attention in planning decisions.

As stakeholders prepare for an ongoing battle to protect the dance studio, it is evident that the conversation around urban development in Oxford must balance the dual necessities of housing and community life. The fate of the dance studio has attracted local attention, setting the stage for a significant consultation process within the planning framework of the city.

The proposal has been formally logged under the reference number 25/00893/FUL and can be accessed through the Oxford City Council’s planning portal for further details and public commentary.

Reference Map

Source: Noah Wire Services