Change is palpable within WPP as Philip Jansen, the new chair, embarks on his first annual general meeting (AGM) since stepping into the role. The former chief executive of BT Group warmly greeted shareholders arriving at WPP’s Rose Court offices in London, a rare move reflecting his desire for transparency and approachability. This openness contrasts sharply with the traditional reticence often exhibited by FTSE 100 board members, signalling Jansen’s intention to foster a more engaging atmosphere as he assumes control.

His predecessor, Roberto Quarta, who held the chairmanship for nearly nine years, faced considerable challenges throughout his tenure, including the controversial exit of Martin Sorrell, the company’s long-standing chief executive. Under Quarta, WPP reportedly became “significantly a stronger company,” but lagged behind competitors in terms of revenue growth and stock performance. Jansen, however, acknowledged that the current landscape is fraught with difficulties, stating the need for structural reinforcements within key divisions such as Group M, which is undergoing a strategic overhaul that will purportedly include significant redundancies.

During the meeting, WPP’s CEO Mark Read outlined three primary objectives: enhancing the use of WPP Open—a technological and AI-driven platform—streamlining Group M, and bolstering their business acquisition successes. Yet, he candidly admitted that the company’s recent financial performance has not met expectations, with reported revenue declines of 2.7% in the first quarter. This downturn prompted concerns among shareholders about WPP’s market standing, especially in comparison to its rivals like Publicis Groupe, which has forecasted growth rates of 4% to 5% for the upcoming period.

The financial context is concerning; one shareholder starkly highlighted the inadequacies in WPP’s total shareholder return (TSR) performance, noting that an investment of £100 in January 2015 had depreciated to £95 by the end of 2024, compared to a surge in the FTSE 100 to £185. Jansen responded to such critiques with a promise of addressing these shortcomings, asserting that the management team is acutely aware of the past decade’s failures and is committed to establishing a framework for sustainable growth.

Yet, the challenges are not merely financial. The advertising landscape is evolving rapidly, with Jansen himself acknowledging that WPP must adapt to a marketing environment increasingly influenced by artificial intelligence and changing client behaviours. Recent procurement strategies to encompass data analytics have started to take shape, highlighted by WPP’s acquisition of the data firm InfoSum. This pivot is necessary not only for retaining existing clients like Coca-Cola but also for positioning WPP competitively against emerging and agile digital-first agencies.

The mood at this year’s AGM, while cordial, suggested a shift among shareholders who, although not in outright revolt, appeared increasingly aware of the need for strategic revamping. Despite support figures hovering around 99.95% for Read’s leadership, echoed by major institutional investors like Harris Associates who foresee potential rebounds as restructuring takes effect, the atmosphere contained an undercurrent of expectation for tangible progress.

As the meeting concluded, a mix of cautious optimism and heightened scrutiny enveloped WPP and its leadership. Jansen’s one-word characterisation of the atmosphere—”testing”—captured a sentiment where stakeholders are prepared to support transformation but are equally waiting for evidence of a viable path forward.

In an era marked by industry disruption, Jansen’s leadership will be pivotal not only in reassuring investors but also in navigating WPP through the evolving challenges of the advertising market.

Reference Map:

Source: Noah Wire Services