British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak is spearheading efforts to pass the Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill, which seeks to address the issue of illegal migration by deporting asylum seekers to Rwanda. Amidst considerable debate and resistance, particularly from the unelected House of Lords, the government is determined to enact the legislation, which has faced a two-month delay due to amendments.

The bill aims to establish Rwanda as a safe destination for asylum seekers, a move that Sunak argues will deter illegal crossings of the English Channel. In defending the bill, the government has emphasized Rwanda’s safety compared to London, with Senior Minister Andrew Mitchell suggesting that Kigali might be even safer.

The bill’s progress through Parliament has been tumultuous, with frequent amendments being passed back and forth between the Commons and the Lords. Despite criticism from various quarters including former Home Secretary Suella Braverman—who described the bill as “fatally flawed”—and independent Lords member Alex Carlile—who criticized the bill as “ill-judged” and potentially unlawful—the Conservative leadership remains unwavering in its commitment.

In addition to addressing policy criticisms, Prime Minister Sunak has responded to emotional appeals, particularly from Afghan allies of British forces who are seeking exemptions from deportation under this bill. Despite strong advocacy from military personnel and politicians for the protection of vulnerable Afghans, the government has maintained a firm stance, with no immediate concessions indicated.

As the legislative battle reaches its critical stages, Sunak has addressed the public in a news conference to rally support for the bill, underscoring its importance in curbing illegal migration and “stopping the boats,” with the government prepared for extended parliamentary sessions to secure the bill’s passage. The outcome of this legislative effort will significantly impact the UK’s asylum and immigration policies moving forward.