Like many of her peers, Abigail (21) actively engages in the world of selfies, meticulously editing her images with various apps before sharing them on social media. She voices a growing concern among young people: the allure of an idealised self-image crafted through technology can warp one’s perception of reality. “You look at that idealised version of yourself and you just want it – you just want it to be real,” she observes, highlighting how these editing tools can foster a longing for unattainable beauty standards.

Recent research, including a study published in New Media & Society, supports Abigail’s sentiments. A team of researchers interviewed nearly 80 young people and found that the advent of selfie-editing technologies is significantly impacting body image and overall well-being among youth. With apps like Facetune, Faceapp, and Meitu becoming increasingly popular, young people are able to transform their images with a breadth of tools—from lighting adjustments to comprehensive “structural” edits that simulate cosmetic surgeries. This expansive capability encourages users to scrutinise their physical appearances, leading to a cascade of micro-changes that can blur the boundaries between reality and digital alteration.

The age of constant visibility in a digitally-networked world compels many young individuals to present their “best selves” online. This digital curation is often a response to the pervasive pressure to conform to societal beauty ideals, intensifying feelings of inadequacy among users. Participants in the research noted that they perceive everyone else’s photos to be edited, creating an unspoken expectation that they must also engage in this visual enhancement to avoid falling behind. This phenomenon resonates with studies indicating that social media platforms like Instagram and Snapchat can act as “toxic mirrors,” exacerbating body dissatisfaction and self-objectification, especially among adolescents.

Many interviewees articulated a troubling but growing trend: a desire to change their appearance in real life to match their edited personas. For instance, Amber (19) candidly stated that “a lot of plastic surgeries are now one step further than a filter.” This sentiment reflects a broader societal shift where tools designed for playful enhancement now serve as precursors to invasive cosmetic procedures. Similarly, Freya (20) mentioned that editing her body in photos directly influenced her decision to undergo lip and cheek fillers. This underscores a concerning link between digital alterations and physical changes, often described as “Snapchat dysmorphia”—a term reflecting the struggle of individuals who seek aesthetic surgery to align their looks with their digital images.

The implications of these trends extend to mental health, particularly concerning young people’s body image. A study found that female undergraduates who posted retouched selfies experienced heightened anxiety and diminished self-esteem compared to those in a control group. This aligns with wider research highlighting how image-altering technologies contribute to negative mental health outcomes, including exacerbated body dysmorphic concerns. The constant exposure to idealised, edited images can warp perceptions and create a cycle of dissatisfaction, where the pressure to achieve an unattainable standard fuels disordered eating and body image issues.

As technology advances, particularly with the integration of artificial intelligence in beauty apps, the potential for these platforms to alter young people’s self-perception and mental health continues to grow. The increasing sophistication of “beauty cam” features that offer hyper-realistic “before and after” visualisations may further distort the relationship between technology and the human experience.

In summary, the use of selfie-editing tools is not merely a harmless pastime; it is a complex social phenomenon that has profound implications for identity, self-worth, and mental health among the youth. Understanding and addressing these impacts is crucial as society navigates the challenges posed by the digital landscape.


Reference Map

  1. Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
  2. Paragraph 4
  3. Paragraph 5
  4. Paragraph 6
  5. Paragraph 5
  6. Paragraph 6
  7. Paragraph 3

Source: Noah Wire Services