Small manufacturers across the United States report mixed effects from increased tariffs under the Trump administration, with some seeing renewed opportunities while others face uncertainty and lost business amid escalating trade tensions.
Small manufacturers across the United States are experiencing a range of effects following the Trump administration’s increased tariff measures aimed at rebalancing global trade. Introduced with the intention of revitalising domestic manufacturing jobs and reducing reliance on foreign imports, the tariffs have generated both support and concern among business owners.
Drew Greenblatt, proprietor of Marlin Steel Wire Products based in Baltimore, expressed his approval of the tariff policy. His company utilises American steel and provides components to sectors such as aerospace and food processing. Speaking to the Times of India, Greenblatt remarked that foreign trade policies have historically disadvantaged US competitors, citing European tariffs as an example that renders American products less competitive overseas. He believes that achieving fairer trade agreements could stimulate growth and employment within the United States.
Conversely, some small business owners are wary of the policy’s unpredictable effects. Corry Blanc, owner of a cookware company in Virginia, highlighted the uncertainty engendered by the tariffs. Although Blanc relies on domestic materials, he acknowledged his limited production capacity, leaving him unable to meet sudden increases in demand. Additionally, he expressed concern over potentially losing international customers amid shifting trade relations.
The impact has already been felt by manufacturers such as Michael Lyons in Maine. Lyons, whose company produces US-made leather goods, lost a longstanding Canadian buyer in the wake of escalating cross-border trade tensions. As a result, he has postponed plans for business expansion due to the growing uncertainties.
On a more optimistic note, Bayard Winthrop, CEO of the clothing brand American Giant, sees the tariffs as a potential avenue to revitalise the American textile industry. Winthrop attributes the decline of domestic textile manufacturing over the past thirty years largely to the effects of globalisation. He suggested that the new trade measures could help rebuild industrial capacity that has been lost.
Meanwhile, on the international stage, trade tensions continue to intensify. China has issued warnings against other countries engaging in trade agreements that could disadvantage Beijing, promising “reciprocal countermeasures” in response to US actions. The Chinese government has criticised the United States for “unilateralism and protectionism,” stating, “Appeasement will not bring peace.”
These developments illustrate the varied experiences and outlooks of small manufacturers navigating the complex landscape of US trade policy under the Trump administration.
Source: Noah Wire Services
- https://budgetlab.yale.edu/research/where-we-stand-fiscal-economic-and-distributional-effects-all-us-tariffs-enacted-2025-through-april – Corroborates the broad economic impact of 2025 tariffs, including consumer price increases equivalent to $3,800 per household, reflecting the policy’s nationwide effects.
- https://nam.org/as-tariffs-hit-manufacturers-brace-for-impact-33695/ – Supports claims about manufacturing sector concerns, detailing how tariffs threaten jobs, supply chains, and competitiveness.
- https://www.efulfillmentservice.com/2025/04/impact-of-april-2025-u-s-tariffs-on-products-industries-and-e-commerce-sellers/ – Details the elimination of the de minimis exemption for small packages from China, illustrating policy changes affecting import-dependent businesses.
- https://www.nav.com/blog/tariffs-4506520/ – Explains how tariffs lead to increased costs, lower profits, and supply chain disruptions for small businesses, aligning with accounts from affected owners.
- https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/04/regulating-imports-with-a-reciprocal-tariff-to-rectify-trade-practices-that-contribute-to-large-and-persistent-annual-united-states-goods-trade-deficits/ – Provides official justification for reciprocal tariffs, reflecting the administration’s goal of addressing trade imbalances mentioned in the article.
Noah Fact Check Pro
The draft above was created using the information available at the time the story first
emerged. We’ve since applied our fact-checking process to the final narrative, based on the criteria listed
below. The results are intended to help you assess the credibility of the piece and highlight any areas that may
warrant further investigation.
Freshness check
Score:
4
Notes:
Narrative references Trump administration policy, now outdated post-2020 presidency. No recent press releases or updates detected, suggesting potential recycled content.
Quotes check
Score:
7
Notes:
Quotes attributed to business owners appear plausible for mid-2018–2020 period, but original source verification for Drew Greenblatt’s Times of India quote proves challenging. Other quotes lack easily traceable early references.
Source reliability
Score:
6
Notes:
Narrative originates from Google News aggregator without explicit authorship. Quotes derive from business owners rather than verified institutional reporting.
Plausability check
Score:
8
Notes:
Claims align with historical 2018–2020 tariff impacts, though lacking specific contemporary evidence. International tensions described remain consistent with past trade patterns.
Overall assessment
Verdict (FAIL, OPEN, PASS): OPEN
Confidence (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH): MEDIUM
Summary:
Content reflects historically accurate trade dynamics but shows signs of temporal dislocation. While individual business impacts appear plausible, inability to verify key quotes and unclear provenance necessitate caution.