High Rejection Rates in SQA Bereavement Appeals Raise Concerns

The Scottish Qualifications Authority (SQA) has recently faced scrutiny over its handling of bereavement-related exam appeals, with an alarming 90% rejection rate for students submitting claims of bereavement affecting their exam performance. This statistic has sparked outrage among students and educators alike, highlighting significant concerns about the fairness and transparency of the appeals process.

The SQA introduced the Exam Exceptional Circumstances Consideration Service (EECCS) to allow students facing personal or environmental challenges to seek redress by submitting supplementary academic materials, such as preliminary exams and class tests. However, recent data indicates that only 10% of EECCS bereavement appeals were successful if the student attempted the exam, contrasting sharply with the approximately 80% success rate for students who chose not to sit the exam at all.

The appeal statistics reveal an even broader concern within the education community. In 2024, the SQA recorded 5,761 requests for the EECCS; only 38% of these resulted in changes to students’ grades. This low success rate has raised questions about how well the SQA’s criteria for evaluating appeals aligns with the needs of students experiencing loss or significant disruption.

Students who attempt the exam in the face of distressing personal circumstances tend to face a steep uphill battle. For those who sat their exams, the chance of successful appeals for reasons such as bereavement, medical conditions, or other personal issues plummeted to about 20%. This has led to accusations that the system disproportionately disadvantages those who try to persevere through challenging circumstances.

This sentiment has been echoed broadly by students and educational stakeholders. An SQA report evaluating the 2023 assessment and appeal process found that many felt the system was unfair and opaque, with only 37% of successful appellants viewing the process as fair. Compounding the issue, nearly half of the students surveyed reported a lack of clarity concerning the EECCS, which appears to be a significant barrier to effective support during an already stressful time.

The SQA’s claims of being the only UK exam board with such a service also come under scrutiny. While it emphasises its unique approach, the existence of a ‘special consideration’ service in England suggests that variations in support are not uniform across the UK, potentially leaving Scottish students at a disadvantage.

The 2024 figures reveal another troubling trend: requests for appeals based on examination disruptions were even less successful, with only 8% achieving grade alterations. Many of these appeals were either cancelled before reaching the final review stage or denied due to a lack of proper reporting of disruptions by invigilators. The SQA contended that in many cases, the reported issues were minor and addressed effectively during the exam.

Furthermore, inconsistencies in appeal success rates have emerged between different types of educational institutions. Independent schools reported a higher success rate of 12.8%, compared to just 9.8% for state schools, and 13.1% for further education colleges. These disparities raise critical questions about equity within the examination system, particularly regarding the benchmark support available for disadvantaged students.

Amid ongoing criticisms regarding the high rejection rates and a lack of clarity, the SQA has maintained that its processes are appropriate, despite calls for a reevaluation. The returning question is whether the current framework truly supports the students it aims to assist or merely offers a façade of support during vulnerable moments.

As the education sector continues to grapple with these issues ahead of the upcoming exam periods, the voice of students will remain crucial in advocating for a system that is genuinely fair and supportive, particularly for those suffering from bereavement or other significant life challenges.

Reference Map:

  • Paragraph 1 – [[1]](https://www.heraldscotland.com/news/25147607.sqa-rejects-90-percent-student-bereavement-appeals/?ref=rss), [[2]](https://www.heraldscotland.com/news/24220543.sqa-students-teachers-call-system-unfair-unclear/)
  • Paragraph 2 – [[1]](https://www.heraldscotland.com/news/25147607.sqa-rejects-90-percent-student-bereavement-appeals/?ref=rss), [[5]](https://www.tes.com/magazine/analysis/secondary/scotland-successful-exam-appeals-by-subject)
  • Paragraph 3 – [[2]](https://www.heraldscotland.com/news/24220543.sqa-students-teachers-call-system-unfair-unclear/), [[3]](https://www.tes.com/magazine/news/secondary/sqa-exam-appeals-what-happened-your-sector-and-subjects-2024)
  • Paragraph 4 – [[1]](https://www.heraldscotland.com/news/25147607.sqa-rejects-90-percent-student-bereavement-appeals/?ref=rss), [[4]](https://www.tes.com/magazine/analysis/secondary/sqa-exam-appeals-fail-schools-blamed)
  • Paragraph 5 – [[3]](https://www.tes.com/magazine/news/secondary/sqa-exam-appeals-what-happened-your-sector-and-subjects-2024), [[6]](https://www.heraldscotland.com/news/23908470.sqa-appeals-success-rate-drops-2023/)
  • Paragraph 6 – [[7]](https://www.tes.com/magazine/news/secondary/sqa-exam-grade-appeals-private-schools-state)

Source: Noah Wire Services