Last week marked a significant moment for the legal profession in the UK as the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) announced its approval of Garfield Law, a new start-up that utilises artificial intelligence (AI) to provide legal services. Paul Philip, the SRA’s chief executive, heralded the development as a “landmark moment for legal services,” a sentiment echoed by many who view AI’s potential to transform access to justice. However, this exuberance raises questions regarding the accuracy of the claims surrounding Garfield Law’s pioneering status.

The SRA’s announcement stated that Garfield Law is the first law firm to offer fully regulated legal services through AI. This assertion, however, is somewhat misleading, as numerous firms have been employing various forms of AI for years—predating even the current developments in machine learning by decades. The origins of AI in legal contexts can be traced back to “expert systems” in the 1980s, which were designed to assist with legal reasoning, albeit in a more primitive form than today’s offerings.

Based in Tunbridge Wells, Kent, Garfield Law focuses on assisting small and medium-sized enterprises with debt recovery, specifically in claims amounting to £10,000. The firm’s services are notably affordable, with costs starting at just £2 for a “polite chaser” letter—a competitive pricing strategy aimed at making legal processes more accessible. By leveraging AI, the firm presents itself as an innovative solution for businesses inundated with unpaid debts, a situation that costs UK small businesses an estimated £6 billion to £20 billion annually.

Importantly, Garfield Law provides a suite of services, including drafting claim forms and settlement letters, and guides users through the small claims court process up to trial. While users appreciate the efficiency and reduced costs, the SRA’s endorsement comes with strict regulations to ensure consumer protection. Garfield Law is required to have regulated solicitors overseeing its operations, maintaining professional standards and client confidentiality while addressing issues such as potential AI “hallucinations”—a known risk in which AI generates incorrect or misleading information.

The approval of Garfield Law signals a broader trend within the legal sector to embrace AI technology, with firms like A&O Shearman also exploring AI to streamline routine tasks. The push towards integrating such technologies could help alleviate some of the burdens on lawyers, allowing them to concentrate on more complex, high-value work. This development has garnered the attention of prominent legal figures, including Lord Justice Colin Birss, who acknowledged the potential of AI innovations to enhance access to justice while addressing existing problems within the court system.

As Garfield Law proceeds with its services, the legal community will be watching closely to see how this model impacts both the practice of law and the experiences of consumers seeking legal recourse. While the notion that Garfield Law is the first AI-driven law firm may be overstated, its establishment marks a noteworthy step in the ongoing intersection of technology and legal services, promising a transformation that could redefine the landscape of legal support for businesses and individuals alike.


Reference Map

  1. 1, 2
  2. 3, 4
  3. 5, 6
  4. 7

Source: Noah Wire Services