Tesla Chair Robyn Denholm firmly denies reports that the board sought to replace Elon Musk as CEO, even as the company navigates declining sales, political controversies, and Musk’s divided focus between his business and Washington role.
Tesla’s Chair Robyn Denholm has publicly refuted reports claiming the company’s board sought to replace Chief Executive Elon Musk amid declining sales and controversy surrounding his political affiliations. Early on Thursday morning, Denholm took to Tesla’s official account on social media platform X to state, “Earlier today, there was a media report erroneously claiming that the Tesla Board had contacted recruitment firms to initiate a CEO search at the company. This is absolutely false… The CEO of Tesla is Elon Musk and the Board is highly confident in his ability to continue executing on the exciting growth plan ahead.”
This statement addresses a report published by the Wall Street Journal the previous day, which alleged that Tesla’s board had engaged headhunters to find a successor for Musk due to concerns over the significant amount of time he was dedicating to his activities in Washington, D.C.
Musk’s intense involvement in political activism, including his support for conservative causes in the United States and globally, has had tangible impacts on Tesla’s business. The automaker has experienced a decline in sales in important markets and faced protests at its dealerships, alongside incidents of car vandalism attributed to the backlash.
Financially, Tesla has seen a sharp drop in profits, with first-quarter earnings plunging 71 percent, falling short of even the most cautious forecasts. The company was also overtaken by Chinese rival BYD as the world’s largest electric vehicle manufacturer. Tesla’s stock has declined by approximately 30 percent since the beginning of the year, resulting in a market capitalisation reduction exceeding $800 billion.
In response to shareholder pressure, Musk recently pledged to scale back his involvement in his role as head of the Department of Government Efficiency (Doge), a position he initially intended to hold until 2026. He committed to “significantly” reallocating his time back to Tesla’s core business. Musk, who holds the title of the world’s richest individual, currently divides his efforts among several ventures, including social media platform X—which he recently merged with his AI company xAI—as well as SpaceX and Neuralink.
Musk’s outspoken style has caused friction, including with members of former President Donald Trump’s cabinet. According to a source familiar with the situation, Musk has substantially vacated his physical office near the White House and now advises on Doge remotely.
Susie Wiles, former chief of staff to Trump, told the New York Post on Wednesday, “Musk hasn’t been [at the White House] physically, but it really doesn’t matter much,” adding that she maintains regular phone contact with the billionaire.
The Financial Times is reporting these developments, highlighting the ongoing complexities surrounding Elon Musk’s leadership of Tesla amid shifting political and market dynamics.
Source: Noah Wire Services
- https://www.reuters.com/business/autos-transportation/tesla-chair-says-board-not-looking-new-ceo-replace-musk-2025-05-01/ – This Reuters article reports that Tesla Chair Robyn Denholm dismissed media reports claiming the company’s board was seeking a new CEO to replace Elon Musk, affirming the board’s confidence in Musk’s leadership.
- https://www.ft.com/content/60c778d4-9e1a-41e0-a1f4-8e0ba797954b – The Financial Times article discusses Tesla’s board denying reports of searching for a new CEO amid concerns over Musk’s political activism and time spent in Washington with President Trump.
- https://www.axios.com/local/phoenix/2025/04/30/arizona-tesla-vandalism-trump-ties – This Axios report highlights increased public backlash against Tesla, including incidents like the arson of a Cybertruck in Arizona, linked to the company’s association with President Trump.
- https://time.com/7280460/tesla-no-longer-only-benchmark-ev-success/ – Time magazine discusses Tesla’s waning dominance in the electric vehicle market, attributing it to Musk’s political involvement and the rise of competitors like BYD.
- https://www.theatlantic.com/podcasts/archive/2025/04/elon-musk-tesla-doge/682566/?utm_source=apple_news – The Atlantic’s podcast episode explores how Musk’s political activism, including his role in the Department of Government Efficiency, is impacting Tesla’s brand and financial performance.
- https://www.ft.com/content/4d10da88-5a0b-49b5-9b29-77286f1985ec – This Financial Times article examines the decline in Tesla’s market value and the challenges Musk faces in refocusing on the company’s core business amid political distractions.
- https://www.ft.com/content/60c778d4-9e1a-41e0-a1f4-8e0ba797954b – Please view link – unable to able to access data
Noah Fact Check Pro
The draft above was created using the information available at the time the story first
emerged. We’ve since applied our fact-checking process to the final narrative, based on the criteria listed
below. The results are intended to help you assess the credibility of the piece and highlight any areas that may
warrant further investigation.
Freshness check
Score:
9
Notes:
The narrative is current and addresses recent events, including financial performance and leadership dynamics. Specific details about the first-quarter earnings and Musk’s roles suggest the information is fresh.
Quotes check
Score:
8
Notes:
Direct quotes from Robyn Denholm and Susie Wiles appear to be from recent statements. The lack of specified original sources for some quotes reduces confidence slightly.
Source reliability
Score:
10
Notes:
The narrative originates from a reputable publication, the Financial Times, known for its reliable reporting and financial analysis.
Plausability check
Score:
9
Notes:
Claims about Tesla’s financial performance and Musk’s involvement in politics are plausible and align with known events. However, some details about specific interactions or decisions may lack concrete evidence.
Overall assessment
Verdict (FAIL, OPEN, PASS): PASS
Confidence (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH): HIGH
Summary:
High confidence in the narrative’s validity due to its origin from a reliable source, recent events covered, and generally plausible claims about Tesla and Elon Musk.