In recent months, the Canary Islands have become a focal point of growing discontent surrounding mass tourism. Reports indicate a significant drop in hotel bookings, raising alarms about the summer season ahead. Once regarded as a prime holiday destination for Brits, Tenerife—one of the most popular islands—faces a challenging landscape as locals express their frustrations over the impact of increasing tourist numbers on their quality of life.

Last year, an impressive 6.2 million international visitors graced Tenerife, drawn by its warm climate, beautiful beaches, and a vibrant hospitality industry. However, this influx has ignited resistance among residents who argue that the rising demand for holiday rentals is forcing them out of the local housing market. Demonstrators point to the strains of over-tourism, including traffic congestion and environmental degradation, which have further fuelled protests demanding that tourists “go home.”

Early indications suggest that anti-tourist sentiment is affecting travel choices. Despite an initial uptick in visitors earlier this year—with January seeing a 3.05 per cent increase—holidaymakers appear to have heeded the concerns voiced by locals. Numerous tourism operators have reported a marked decline in bookings as people reassess their travel plans against a backdrop of unrest.

Pedro Aldonso, president of the CEOE business association in Tenerife, has highlighted the fragility of traveller confidence. He stated, “Every small collapse has an echo in trust. When confidence falls, investment comes to a halt.” He emphasised the need for dialogue and mutual understanding to address the growing divide between locals and the tourism industry.

The protests are not an isolated phenomenon; they reflect a broader movement across Spain, where tens of thousands have rallied against what is perceived as unsustainable tourism practices. In April, reports indicated that 57,000 demonstrators in the Canary Islands called for limits on tourist numbers and measures such as an eco-tax to mitigate the environmental impact. Local residents have expressed concern that the current tourism model prioritises profit over their livelihoods and well-being, with many calling for urgent reforms.

While the tourism sector contributes approximately 35% to the economy of the Canary Islands and supports over 40% of local jobs, the model is increasingly viewed as unsustainable. In 2023, the islands welcomed around 16 million tourists, outnumbering the resident population of 2.2 million by more than seven times. This imbalance has heightened worries about resource depletion and the long-term viability of relying so heavily on tourism.

In response to the protests, TUI, a major European travel company, has recently decided to direct investments toward staff housing rather than expanding hotel accommodations. This shift reflects growing awareness among travel operators about the backlash against tourism and its associated issues. TUI’s CEO downplayed the extent of the protests reported in some media while underscoring the importance of addressing local concerns to maintain sustainable operations.

This mounting anti-tourism sentiment in the Canaries signals a potential shift in travel patterns within Europe. Nearby destinations, such as Turkey, are likely to benefit from the unrest, as tourists seek alternative locations that promise both relaxation and a more harmonious relationship with local communities. Turkish officials anticipate a record number of visitors this year, particularly from traditionally strong markets like Russia, Germany, and the UK.

As the Canary Islands grapple with these complex layers of discontent, the future of its tourism sector hangs in the balance. The situation calls for innovative solutions that address the needs of both tourists and local communities while ensuring the preservation of the islands’ unique environment and culture.


Reference Map

  1. Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
  2. Paragraphs 1, 2, 6
  3. Paragraphs 2, 5, 6
  4. Paragraphs 4, 5, 6
  5. Paragraph 2, 6
  6. Paragraph 3
  7. Paragraph 3

Source: Noah Wire Services