In an unexpected turn of events, two regular customers have been banned for life from the Gobi restaurant after reportedly overindulging in their all-you-can-eat offer, sparking a debate over dining practices.
In a surprising turn of events at the Gobi restaurant on Middle Street, two regular patrons, George Dalmon and Andy Miles, have been banned for life after reportedly consuming five stir-fry bowls each during a single visit. This decision was announced by the restaurant’s manager, who expressed considerable frustration over the diners’ behaviour, which he alleges has negatively impacted the business.
The incident unfolded on a recent Tuesday night, with Mr. Dalmon sharing his perspective on the situation. He noted that the restaurant promotes an all-you-can-eat experience, which he felt legitimised their approach to dining. “They’ve only got small bowls and you can’t get enough in there so we always go back for more. It’s an all-you-can-eat place so we love it,” he said. However, the manager viewed their actions quite differently, accusing the duo of “eating him out of business” and likening their dining habits to those of “pigs.”
According to Mr. Dalmon, the confrontation escalated when the manager approached their table in clear distress, berating them in front of other customers and ultimately issuing the ban. “I couldn’t believe it,” he remarked, adding that the manager’s outburst seemed both unexpected and excessive, especially as they had been loyal customers for two years.
The restaurant’s owner, who declined to be named, confirmed the ban, citing that the behaviour of Mr. Dalmon and Mr. Miles was “the final straw.” He elaborated on the situation by explaining that the pair consistently arrived at the buffet in a frenzy, consuming food more quickly than other diners could access it. “They spoil everything and they are in such a hurry to beat everyone to the food,” he stated.
Additionally, the manager expressed dissatisfaction with their choice of beverages, noting that they opted only for water instead of purchasing drinks, and consistently avoided paying the optional service charge. His concluding statement underscored the restaurant’s commercial nature: “We are not a charity. We are a business. It’s our restaurant and we can tell people not to come back if we don’t want them to.”
The ban comes despite the restaurant’s promotion of creating “your own individual meal – and eat all you like,” suggesting a potential disconnect between the establishment’s marketing and its operational policies. As of now, Dalmon and Miles remain excluded from returning to Gobi, leaving both the diners and the restaurant manager with starkly differing views on the situation.
Source: Noah Wire Services
- https://www.nbcconnecticut.com/news/national-international/natl-english-pair-finds-limit-to-all-you-can-eat/1915959/ – Corroborates the story of George Dalmon and Andy Miles being banned from a restaurant for overeating at an all-you-can-eat buffet. This report highlights their experience and the restaurant’s reaction.
- https://wjla.com/news/nation-world/george-dalmon-andy-miles-barred-from-great-britain-mongolian-restaurant-80566 – Reports on the details of George Dalmon and Andy Miles’ ban from the Mongolian restaurant, mentioning the manager’s frustration with their eating habits.
- https://www.imdb.com/news/ni37545191/ – Provides additional coverage of the incident involving Dalmon and Miles at the Gobi Mongolian Barbecue Restaurant, including their consumption of multiple bowls of stir-fry.
- https://www.noahwire.com – Original source of the article detailing the ban of George Dalmon and Andy Miles from Gobi, though the specific article is not directly linked. It discusses their perspective and the restaurant’s reasoning for the ban.
- https://www.nbcconnecticut.com/news/local – NBC Connecticut’s general news section, which might include articles similar to the one about Dalmon and Miles, though not directly linked.
Noah Fact Check Pro
The draft above was created using the information available at the time the story first
emerged. We’ve since applied our fact-checking process to the final narrative, based on the criteria listed
below. The results are intended to help you assess the credibility of the piece and highlight any areas that may
warrant further investigation.
Freshness check
Score:
8
Notes:
The narrative appears to be relatively recent, mentioning a specific incident without any clear indication of being out-of-date. However, no specific date for the incident is provided.
Quotes check
Score:
4
Notes:
The earliest known reference for the quotes could not be identified, but they seem to be an original source from the narrative. Further verification is needed to confirm their origin.
Source reliability
Score:
8
Notes:
The narrative originates from The Argus, a reputable local news source. However, without additional contextual information or corroboration from other sources, the reliability is not maximised.
Plausability check
Score:
9
Notes:
The claims, while somewhat unusual, are plausible within the context of a restaurant dealing with perceived abuse of an all-you-can-eat policy. The situation seems plausible given the potential for customer exploitation.
Overall assessment
Verdict (FAIL, OPEN, PASS): OPEN
Confidence (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH): MEDIUM
Summary:
The event described seems plausible but could benefit from additional verification. The narrative’s freshness and source reliability are strong, while quote verification is less certain. Overall, the narrative appears believable but requires further confirmation to reach higher confidence.
