The UK Covid-19 Inquiry reveals significant criticisms of leadership during the pandemic, focusing on Boris Johnson’s engagement and the strained relationships between the UK and devolved governments.
In the UK Covid-19 Inquiry, significant criticisms have been leveled at the UK’s leadership during the pandemic, particularly focusing on the actions and engagement of Boris Johnson, who has since resigned as a member of parliament. Mark Drakeford, the outgoing First Minister of Wales, described Johnson’s approach to the crisis as akin to an “absent” football manager, highlighting a lack of leadership and engagement with devolved nations. This was exemplified by Johnson’s failure to chair crucial meetings, leaving Michael Gove to play a significant, yet challenging role without full support. Drakeford pointed out confusion between the UK and devolved governments over the legislative basis for pandemic response powers, criticizing the then-UK health secretary, Matt Hancock, for misstatements about the devolution of public health.
Moreover, Welsh Health Minister Baroness Eluned Morgan expressed feelings of disparity, suggesting Wales felt like “second-class citizens” compared to England, especially regarding financial support measures like the furlough scheme. The inquiry in Cardiff also explored the informal use of WhatsApp for government communications and the financial pressures on Wales due to dependency on Westminster for pandemic funds.
Drakeford provided a detailed account of the strained relationship between the Westminster and Welsh governments. He cited examples of Wales’ perspective being underrepresented and instances where Welsh decisions were overridden by Johnson, based on advice from his advisors. Despite efforts to maintain clear and consistent public health messaging, Drakeford faced challenges, including disagreements over the UK-wide approach to messaging and measures such as banning mass gatherings.
Reflecting on the handling of the pandemic, Drakeford acknowledged that Wales could have acted sooner in certain aspects but voiced skepticism towards a centralized approach for future pandemics, emphasizing the importance of coordinated decision-making across all four UK nations.
The inquiry continues to reveal insights into the intricate decision-making process and the dynamic between the UK government and its devolved counterparts, shedding light on the challenges of managing a public health crisis across a union of nations.
